I'm interested as well!
Thanks,
-- markus.
Craig L Russell wrote:
If anyone could use a MSDN license for developing OpenJPA, please send
me email so I can coordinate the number of licenses. No guarantees
that we will get the number we want, but let me know if you're
interested.
Thanks,
Cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517657
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Reece,
I was quite busy this week, but I will start on addressing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516785
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-177:
--
This problem should be solved by openjpa-235-break-nullable.patch
onfused. If the current testcase works with the Sun JDK, why am I
getting different results just because I changed the equality checks for the
IBM JDK? I also just tried changing the testcase per your patch for the
node and edge definitions and I still get the same result. So, we're not o
Maybe it just my mail client that's only showing my updated patch to
address the test failure. This is my original comment to Kevin's email:
Hi Kevin, all,
I have found several places in DepthFirstAnalysis, Graph, Edge, and the
testcase that was using the wrong equality check. The testcase is
Index:
openjpa-lib/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/graph/TestDepthFirstAnalysis.java
===
---
openjpa-lib/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/graph/TestDepthFirstAnalysis.java
(revision 561053)
+++
openjpa-lib/src/test/java/o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Fuchs updated OPENJPA-231:
-
Attachment: openjpa-231.patch
I propose a slight change to Gokhan's patch, please see op
ct.Method.invoke(Method.java:615)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
SurefireBooter.java:225)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(
SurefireBooter.java:747)
On 7/18/07, Markus Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Marc.
Thanks Marc. I added debug statements the the code accessing the
_nodeInfo Map. Could somebody please try the attached patch!
-- markus.
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
As a random shot in the dark (I can't reproduce the error on my
machine), I notice that the _nodeInfo Map is relying on keys bein
I'll investigate as well. Can I download IBM's vm from somewhere?
Thanks,
-- markus.
Patrick Linskey wrote:
NodeInfo almost certainly can't be the problem -- that's a final int,
so should be inlined by the compiler, and the class lookup shouldn't
even happen at runtime in that case.
-Patrick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Fuchs updated OPENJPA-235:
-
Attachment: openjpa-235-break-nullable-070716.patch
Thanks Craig for the review! To your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511905
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-177:
--
Daniel,
I submitted a patch for OPENJPA-235 that prevents nullifying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Fuchs updated OPENJPA-235:
-
Attachment: openjpa-235-break-nullable.patch
This patch guarantees that circular dependencies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508289
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Hi Kevan,
Is it possible that the tests failing with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506619
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Hi Kevin & Kevan,
The current implementatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12504478
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Hi Reece,
I started implementing my proposal. As the 3 steps are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503698
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Hi all,
I propose the following steps to extend dependency management
;-Where" mean the SET and WHERE clause of a SQL (UPDATE)
statement? What are the values in ForeignKeyWhere? Aren't these before
image values? Also, I expect updates to be done referencing pk columns
only, like WHERE pk1 = ?, ..., pkN = ?
Thanks again,
-- markus.
-Patrick
On 6/7
Hi all,
could somebody please answer these questions?
1) Does OpenJPA create before images for rollback? Or is the transaction
rollback functionality just implemented in the JDO closed source? As
Reece mentions, we'd need before image values on relationships for
dependency calculation in case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Fuchs updated OPENJPA-235:
-
Attachment: openjpa-235-test2.zip
Hi Patrick,
from comments in ConstraintUpdateManager (line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501352
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Gokhan,
I applied your patch and ran the TCK successfully again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500542
]
Markus Fuchs commented on OPENJPA-235:
--
Hi Reece,
I ran the JPA TCK with your changes, and all tests passed
22 matches
Mail list logo
