Hi Jacek,
Based on that description, it sounds like a bug in OpenJPA's list
handling somewhere.
Do the SQL statements issued differ?
-Patrick
On 11/28/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got two entities: Osoba (Whole) and Konto (Part) in OneToMany
> association. Each
Hi,
I don't have access to source right now, but you might be able to do
something with a setter on Select, which I believe is responsible for
creating the string (well, the SQLBuffer) for the WHERE and FROM
clauses. (As you may have noticed, the Select interface has evolved
into something more li
Great. FTR I agree that it should be eager by default. I thought we
fixed this recently.
-Patrick
On 11/28/07, gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dah ! thankyou ...the following works
> (for the record i assumed Eager loading was default for Enum since
> one-to-one mapping?!)
>
> @Column( na
Hi,
Are you using the OpenJPA enhancer? What happens if you explicitly set
the fetch mode to eager in the @Enumerated annotation?
-Patrick
On 11/28/07, gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, i have a WebsphereCE application environment (OpenEJB/OpenJPA
> 1.0.0/MySQL 5.0.27 with JDBC driver 3.
Funny, there was a thread yesterday in which I mentioned the
inefficency that necessitates the subquery in your example.
It sounds like a bug to me.
-Patrick
On 11/28/07, Ognjen Blagojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try to do an update by query like this
>
> em = emf.createEntityManager();
Hi,
Can you post your persistence.xml? Does it list out your persistent
types explicitly, including the mapped superclasses?
-Patrick
On 11/16/07, John M VanAntwerp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We're using 1.0.0 and are having a problem with entities that inherit from
> abstract classes marked
Hi,
You should look at the AbstractStoreManager. The XML store is a
(simplistic) example of how to use the abstract store.
-Patrick
On 11/16/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out if and how I could make OpenJPA work on top
> of a JCR content repository l
Based on catalina's description, it sounds like her change will
re-introduce the dependency issue. I'm guessing that we either need to
work out the phases correctly or do some trickery / duplication in the
profiles.
-Patrick
On 9/11/07, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Craig
FWIW, I have a teamcity instance running that builds, tests, runs the
tck, and uploads 1.0.x whenever there's a svn checkin.
-Patrick
On 8/30/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you ask continuum-users or -dev?
>
> The branch support in Continuum is quite new and I don't have a lot
Yes, but here is no portale way to disambiguate in the non-container
enment (that I am aware of, at least). If the user has so configured
the classpath, and wants isolation, the manual specification of
orm.xml files is always available.
Things are different, of course, in the in-container case.
-
Hi,
They might just be victims of copying and pasting the commands
execite as expected.
-Patrick
On 8/28/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I think you might need a few more "\" to connect the mvn command line
> fragments.
>
> Aside from that, I have no idea if
Why? It seems like if the commiters are responsible about only
committing things that would belong on the maintenance branch
eventually anyways, then that's good enough. The benefit is that if
the release does need to be rebuilt, then the additional tweaks
automagically get picked up.
Bear in mind
Hi,
Yeah, I didn't fix the problem, I just made it a warning. We probably
need to do some ClassLoader experimentation to figure out why the
PersistenceCapable check is failing.
-Patrick
On 8/22/07, Prashant Bhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, It's working now with openjpa.RuntimeUn
Hi,
I think that it's fair game for hardening / bugfix changes, but I
don't think that we should hold up the release for everything.
Note that a new candidate build will be kicking off in the next 30
mins or so (if it hasn't already).
Do you think that this issue is worth holding things up for,
+1
On 8/7/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going to turn this into a vote, just to get the ball rolling a
> little faster.
>
> The vote in question is to whether we will cut a release and begin
> the release voting process on Monday, August 20th, 2007 (with the
> ultimate
FYI, the reason that you're not seeing the updates is because those
extensions are only consulted when doing the initial mapping
generation, not on subsequent updates.
-Patrick
On 7/10/07, David Ezzio (asmtp) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Frank,
I would approach your problem in a somewhat diff
I think that the benefit is that it let's the user code take control
when it wants / needs to.
Certainly, the behavior should be (and is currently) the same for
annotations and XML.
If we do decide that generated values should not be user-settable,
then we must guarantee this in code with a good
It's certainly possible, but I had assumed that people would rather do
a weekday. Does anyone have strong preferences?
-Patrick
On 7/9/07, Aditi Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it not possible to have the meeting on a saturday?
From: Michael Dick [EM
Sounds good to me.
-Patrick
On 7/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The dates are fine with me.
I have an agenda item for the meeting. Bill Pugh (who develops
FindBugs) is in town and would be able to talk to us about how to use
FindBugs to not only scrub the existing code base (
19 matches
Mail list logo
