[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650522#action_12650522
]
Milosz Tylenda commented on OPENJPA-773:
The [1] link points to the Early Draft. T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651235#action_12651235
]
Jeremy Bauer commented on OPENJPA-773:
--
Attached patches to GERINIMO-4410 for the rem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12669762#action_12669762
]
Dianne Richards commented on OPENJPA-773:
-
The JPA 2.0 spec adds the following met
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697614#action_12697614
]
Albert Lee commented on OPENJPA-773:
JPA 1 defines only {READ, WRITE} LockModeType, bu
Jeremy,
Re: incompatible method signatures... I agree. We definitely do need to
address this. Since the spec overrides our implementation, we might just
have a migration issue for our customers. Hopefully, this hasn't been used
extensively. Maybe we should open a sub-task JIRA issue to keep t
