[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-712) Not correctly parsing the "having" clause with aggregate functions (ie. max, min, etc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fay Wang updated OPENJPA-712: - Attachment: openjpa-712.patch The change in JPQL.jjt takes into account aggregate expression in the null

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-712) Not correctly parsing the "having" clause with aggregate functions (ie. max, min, etc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fay Wang updated OPENJPA-712: - Attachment: openjpa-712-1.patch Attached is the test case. > Not correctly parsing the "having" clause

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-712) Not correctly parsing the "having" clause with aggregate functions (ie. max, min, etc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Heath Thomann updated OPENJPA-712: -- Attachment: OPENJPA-712-1.2.x.patch I'm providing patch OPENJPA-712-1.2.x.patch which, as its

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-712) Not correctly parsing the "having" clause with aggregate functions (ie. max, min, etc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dick updated OPENJPA-712: - Fix Version/s: 1.2.3 Patch Info: [Patch Available] > Not correctly parsing the "having" c