Everything is passing again w/o any changes. Looks like it was just a
timing issue
-Donald
On 2/13/10 10:02 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> What's the failure?
>
> 1509 is much more likely than 1507, as it's a change to allow enums to
> be assigned in bulk updates. It's within the realm of r
What's the failure?
1509 is much more likely than 1507, as it's a change to allow enums to
be assigned in bulk updates. It's within the realm of reason that JPQL
forbids such assignments -- I didn't check, and just assumed that the
lack of enum support was a holdover from the 1.4 days.
IM
Some change in the last day is causing a 1.0b TCK regression on trunk.
When I get a chance, I'll try backing out the changes for 1509 or 1507
and see which one caused it.
-Donald
