Jenkins build is back to normal : Red5 Trunk #220

See

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

I think Artyom is right. Red5Sip is not the scope of the OpenMeetings project. Me might discuss on how we can make it the scope, if we are able to create an Incubator project around Red5Sip. I think for the end user this discussion (scope or not) is a rather esoteric discussion as they are simply

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Hello Alexei, I've just changed sip integration instruction a little by adding denoise and dsp_drop_silence attributes and removed silent detection in red5sip because there were some problems with it. I think we shouldn't include any information about red5sip improvement into Openmeetings release

Re: client/admin modularity rambling

I fully support going step by step. Users won't accept too many changes at once, and we will have time to fix bugs. -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, http://openmeetings.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Sebastian, I have tested audio SIP integration by using SIP bridge for my own conferences. As a result, Artyom found out that disabling jitter-buffer in the Asterisk configuration improves audio. Artyom, where one can find your findings on the Apache web site? Does it worth reflecting this in relea