I would like to continue discussion and get your opinion on how "HTML5
features" should be added to the room.

I see 3 options
1) development is performed in 3.1.x branch
Pros:

   - we don't need to maintain additional branch
   - dev versions to test can be taken from usual location
   - we will "burn the bridge" and next release will contain updated room

Cons:

   - 3.1.x will be unusable for some period of time
   - some well tested features might be broken during merge


2) additional 3.2.x branch is created
Pros:

   - 3.1.x branch will stay clear and we can release some patch versions

Cons:

   - we have to maintain 3 branches


3) development is performed in trunk
Pros:

   - no new branches

Cons:

   - "OpenLaszlo free" branch is no more "OpenLaszlo free" :(


I personally prefer option 1) above, but option 2) might also be OK due to
our last 2 releases were not properly signed and we might need to release
3.1.2 without new room ....


WDYT?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:

> ok.. I will try to get a few people here to help me... ;-)
>
>
> Am 12.04.2016 um 07:26 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
>> Thanks for the response Peter :)
>> will start adding HTML5 features to the room :)
>> will send requests for testing :)
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>> no help with the list from my site.. It is working I think ;-)
>>>
>>> 2nd part..
>>>
>>> I wouldn't say ugly... it is more like "no surprises"... Like using
>>> java-applications... you know the colors, button style etc... and more
>>> html5 would be one more step to get ride of flash... I would appreciate
>>> that...
>>>
>>> Greetings Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.04.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> I currently using this list [1] as the list of features for 3.1.2, maybe
>>>> it
>>>> is not perfect and you know how to make it better? :)))
>>>> Additionally today I heard "OM room is ugly" :( I can add more HTML5
>>>> elements to the room (WebSockets semms to work as expected)
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-853?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.1.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to