+1 binding
I did run the eval tests and they all run through, including the one that
needs more memory.
William
2017-02-03 13:35 GMT-02:00 Suneel Marthi :
> +1 binding
>
> Verified {src, bin} * {zip, tar} and all tests pass.
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Russ, Daniel (NIH/CIT) [E] <
> dr
+1 binding
Verified {src, bin} * {zip, tar} and all tests pass.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Russ, Daniel (NIH/CIT) [E] <
dr...@mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Have not run across problems with external code that
> uses OpenNLP
>
> On 2/3/17, 9:57 AM, "Rodrigo Agerri" wrote:
>
>
+1 (non-binding) Have not run across problems with external code that uses
OpenNLP
On 2/3/17, 9:57 AM, "Rodrigo Agerri" wrote:
+1 also pass tests
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Jeffrey Zemerick
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Build and tests pass with no issues.
>
+1 also pass tests
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Jeffrey Zemerick
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Build and tests pass with no issues.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I did run the eval tests and they all run through except one test which
> > needed mo
+1 (non-binding) Build and tests pass with no issues.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> +1
>
> I did run the eval tests and they all run through except one test which
> needed more memory, that test case has to be adapted to run fast and with
> much less memory, we should
+1
I did run the eval tests and they all run through except one test which
needed more memory, that test case has to be adapted to run fast and with
much less memory, we should do that for the 1.7.3 release.
Jörn
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> The Apache OpenNLP PMC wou
