Re: [DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-06-03 Thread Richard Zowalla
Hi all, it seems, that we have consensus for 1.0.(0) - I will create a PR and raise the version accordingly. Gruß Richard On 2024/05/29 07:19:10 Martin Wiesner wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 for option (a). > > The previous comments are absolutely valid: Models won’t be released as often > as the

Re: [DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-05-29 Thread Martin Wiesner
Hi all, +1 for option (a). The previous comments are absolutely valid: Models won’t be released as often as the OpenNLP core artifacts. With this in mind, option (b) is somewhat artificial and could even confuse the community, in case there is no „most recent“ model release that matches the t

Re: [DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-05-28 Thread Jeff Zemerick
I favor option (a) because we likely won't release models as frequently but we will have to keep track of what's compatible with what. There is a manifest file inside the model files and it contains the version number of OpenNLP that trained the model. It's used to check if the version of OpenNLP

Re: [DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-05-28 Thread Atita Arora
hi, Thanks for initiating this discussion regarding the future version scheme for our OpenNLP Maven module distribution. Personally, I lean towards option (a) as it establishes a fresh starting point for our Maven module distribution. However, I'm open to hearing others' thoughts and considerations

Re: [DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-05-27 Thread Richard Zowalla
Hi, From my point of view, we are not releasing models as often as we release opennlp-tools. And pushing a new version without having actual changes in supplied models, looks somehow odd to me. So personally, I would be in favor for having a separate versioning scheme for it. Gruß Richard >

Re: [DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-05-27 Thread Bruno Kinoshita
Hi! Thanks for starting this! I do not have a preference for a, b, or c, as long as it's explained/documented to users, I think they will be happy to be able to see the model in their dependency tree. Thank you! On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 16:15, Richard Zowalla wrote: > Hi all, > > with [1] we wil

[DISCUSS] Version Scheme for OpenNLP Models

2024-05-27 Thread Richard Zowalla
Hi all, with [1] we will make a step forward in order to distrubute OpenNLP models via Maven Central. While we still need to integrate all other models, Martin (W.) raised the valid question about the future version scheme of our opennlp maven module distribution. Do we want to - (a) Start w