Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-25 Thread Martin Wiesner
+1 On 2023/01/23 17:16:33 Jeff Zemerick wrote: > If there aren't any objections, I will plan to make a 2.1.1 RC1 and start > the release vote this week with what's currently in the main branch. > > It looks like the only outstanding PR is to add logging and it will be good > for a 2.2.0 release.

Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-25 Thread Richard Zowalla
+1 Am Montag, dem 23.01.2023 um 12:16 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick: > If there aren't any objections, I will plan to make a 2.1.1 RC1 and > start > the release vote this week with what's currently in the main branch. > > It looks like the only outstanding PR is to add logging and it will > be good

Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-23 Thread Jeff Zemerick
If there aren't any objections, I will plan to make a 2.1.1 RC1 and start the release vote this week with what's currently in the main branch. It looks like the only outstanding PR is to add logging and it will be good for a 2.2.0 release. Thanks, Jeff On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:51 PM Bruno Kino

Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-11 Thread Bruno Kinoshita
Good point on the breaking changes. Maybe a 2.2 with an introductory paragraph in the announcement email & in the changelog about these breaking changes? Cheers Bruno On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:49, Richard Zowalla wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > I am a big +1 for a release. > > There are some (minor) meth

Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-11 Thread Martin Wiesner
Hi Jeff et al., here's my +1 on releasing "2.1.1" soon. Maybe, we can include the PR for OPENNLP-1441 I opened minutes ago. If something quality-related should be left in order to get out a consistent release, please let me know or open a Jira. I'll see what I can contribute. IMHO, the "Logging

Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-11 Thread Richard Zowalla
Hi Jeff, I am a big +1 for a release. There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos, removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in replacement for some users as they need to adjust code. If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in

Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-11 Thread Bruno Kinoshita
We are getting a lot of great contributions, and the sooner we release it the better IMO, to get it out to be tested and to get feedback, as well as create a milestone for further work. So +1! Thanks Jeff Bruno On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:31, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Since the la

Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release

2023-01-11 Thread Jeff Zemerick
Hi everyone, Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56 closed Jira tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few minor fixes. Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a