Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:43, jonathon wrote: > > > > On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. > > I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice > moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed. > > Lee

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread jonathon
On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed. Lee Elman is just as likely to be a victim as Apache OpenOffice is. >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon wrote: > > > > On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. > > That is the name of the software. > I've seen three or four different names for the vendor. > >> Who then is getting this money? > > Scammers

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread jonathon
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. That is the name of the software. I've seen three or four different names for the vendor. > Who then is getting this money? Scammers. jonathon * English - detected * English * English sign

RE: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 15:23 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [ ... ] > Since there are concerns that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >> > >> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server > >> level? Detect the incoming link based on the refe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> >> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server >> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming >> from the offending website and then red

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server > level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming > from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage > where we explain to the use

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally > unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 > > They link to http://openoffice.org for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Marcus
Am 12/03/2014 12:23 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [...] Since there are concerns that the power to decide what to reject can be too subjective, I'm asking that we (subject to lazy consensus) agree that "Quick Office Pro" posts can be rejected with the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 02 Dec2014, at 18:23, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally >> unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is >> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id88901151

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally > unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 > > They link to http://openoffice.org for user s

Re: Officeshots.org

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Hi, > On 02 Dec2014, at 17:43, Michiel Leenaars > wrote: > > Dear Apache OpenOffice developers, > > > as some of you will know we have the 10th ODF plugfest coming up next > week, hosted by the UK Cabinet Office [1] - for which you are all > invited, of course. For that purpose (and to suppo

Officeshots.org

2014-12-02 Thread Michiel Leenaars
Dear Apache OpenOffice developers, as some of you will know we have the 10th ODF plugfest coming up next week, hosted by the UK Cabinet Office [1] - for which you are all invited, of course. For that purpose (and to support the UK government migration to ODF) we are working hard on Officeshots.or

[PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Andrea Pescetti
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 They link to http://openoffice.org for user support. This results in many off-topic requests to the

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread Roberto Galoppini
We're back at full capacity. Roberto 2014-12-02 20:19 GMT+01:00 Marcus : > Sending the answer also to Andrea. > > > > Am 12/02/2014 07:13 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: > >> We're facing some issues at the moment on the SourceForge site currently. >> We're working on getting this fixed as soon a

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread Marcus
Sending the answer also to Andrea. Am 12/02/2014 07:13 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: We're facing some issues at the moment on the SourceForge site currently. We're working on getting this fixed as soon as we can. Sorry for the inconvenience. Roberto 2014-12-02 18:43 GMT+01:00 andrea batti

Re: Proposal: Year end website updates

2014-12-02 Thread Marcus
Am 12/01/2014 05:33 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: We did this last year as well, I recall. I'm assuming lazy consensus to do the same for duration of holiday season, when many people look to end-of-year gift giving and charitable donations. Two changes: 1) Change alert to "Help us Help the World: Don

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread Roberto Galoppini
We're facing some issues at the moment on the SourceForge site currently. We're working on getting this fixed as soon as we can. Sorry for the inconvenience. Roberto 2014-12-02 18:43 GMT+01:00 andrea battinelli : > Dear sirs, > > it appears that the link leads to cycling. Address > > http://sou

Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread andrea battinelli
Dear sirs, it appears that the link leads to cycling. Address http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ comes up again and again after having chosen "4.1.1" in a page, "mirror" in the following page, and "it" in the following one. Sincerely, *Browser variables**Values*navigato

Re: Another Basic Function that doesn't Work!!

2014-12-02 Thread Alain Torrens
It does?The attached doc contains 2013 April 5 in various formats, and I could not find it with any search string: 2013-04-05, 04/05/13, 4/5/13, April 5, 2013,... Please tell me how to do it. '10/11/12 demonstrates...' how?TAB From: jonathon To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Monday,

Re: Open Office Persian "Farsi" language

2014-12-02 Thread FR web forum
Hello, The best place when you have problems is our support forum: https://forum.openoffice.org - Mail original - De: "Darvin Darvin" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Dimanche 23 Novembre 2014 09:57:13 Objet: Open Office Persian "Farsi" language Hi, I was download the open office la

Re: Another Basic Function that doesn't Work!!

2014-12-02 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 01/12/14 22:33, Darren Myers wrote: > Thank you that worked! > > Very frustrated why Can't that be set as a default... its such a common task > to find and replace.?? as far as I know regular expression search is not on by default. And if I search January 2014 and try to replace it with Dece