On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/03/2015 Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
What about actually doing something?
That, sir, is insulting. If you want to propose a resolution,
do so, but please do not
Hi
For those who do not follow some of the foundation mailing lists.
A new tool has arrived. It can be used by any PMC member:
https://reporter.apache.org/?openoffice
It contains information that makes it easier to write correct board
reports, but it also contains general information which I
Hi Marcus,
Hi all,
2015-03-06 18:45 GMT+01:00 Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
[...]
Maybe it's a bit difficult to still find an interesting topic because of
the hugh amount of extensions. But it is indeed a great start into
OpenOffice development.
You are right but there are perhaps also
On 08-03-2015, at 15:14, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
For those who do not follow some of the foundation mailing lists.
Jan, what mail lists would you recommend interested members follow?
louis
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Hi Marcus,
2015-03-08 16:33 GMT+01:00 Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
[...]
What do you mean with boring subject? Education? I hope it's not seen as
boring because it is the key for everything in our life. ;-)
I mean that I'm discussing about extensions which is a little off topics
here. But
On 07/03/2015 Dave Barton wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
when one does not have access to the privileged
conversations of the PMC, actions that use those conversations as
justification appear hostile, as do dismissive PMC member reactions
Well, if it is true (and it is true) that the private list
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
You are suggesting a usage pattern of the private list that is far beyond
reality.
I am not. I am pointing out there is no way for me to know, and that the
strong reactions to Dave's original (modest reasonable)
Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com:
Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git?
+1 any Git.
the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving to Git would make
changes on the website impossible - until someone rewrites the code that
is doing the
Am 03/08/2015 11:13 AM, schrieb Guy Waterval:
Hi Marcus,
Hi all,
2015-03-06 18:45 GMT+01:00 Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de:
[...]
Maybe it's a bit difficult to still find an interesting topic because of
the hugh amount of extensions. But it is indeed a great start into
OpenOffice development.
Am 03/08/2015 04:52 PM, schrieb jan i:
On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com:
Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git?
+1 any Git.
the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 07/03/2015 Dave Barton wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
when one does not have access to the privileged
conversations of the PMC, actions that use those conversations as
justification appear hostile, as do dismissive PMC member reactions
Well, if it is true (and it is
On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com:
Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git?
+1 any Git.
the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving to Git would make
changes on the website
On 08/03/2015 Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
What about actually doing something?
That, sir, is insulting. If you want to propose a resolution,
do so, but please do not attempt to hand out jobs.
Volunteering to do something is much more
13 matches
Mail list logo
