Am 11.05.2017 um 22:39 schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
the 404 is now gone.
But so is the usable table of downloads, which is completely lost. I
believe that is an unwelcome step backwards.
feel free to add a new webpage. OK, honestly there is no need t
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
>
> the 404 is now gone.
But so is the usable table of downloads, which is completely lost. I
believe that is an unwelcome step backwards.
S.
Am 11.05.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.05.2017 um 23:21 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.05.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Hagar Delest:
A user raised this strange result: when performing a Google search with
"openoffice download", the 3.4.1 version is the 3rd choice, this tends
to present the 3.4.1
Am 11.05.2017 um 21:04 schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit :
So, there must be something special in the kind of seaching that the
user is doing.
I tried myself (see screenshot in the forum) with the standard search.
So nothing special at all.
I've deleted the webpage
On 5/11/2017 11:01 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I cam across this thread on an Ubuntu forum
> https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2360989
>
> The gist of it is that Win 10 S (out of the box) will not run 32 bit
> applications.
>
> I have not delved into the depths of Windows 10 and Microsoft
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Hagar Delest
wrote:
> Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit :
>
> I've deleted the webpage that is mentioned in the result page the user has
>> posted in the screenshot. As soon as Google is re-indexing our website I
>> expect that this special webpage is recogniz
Le 10/05/2017 à 23:21, Marcus a écrit :
So, there must be something special in the kind of seaching that the user is
doing.
I tried myself (see screenshot in the forum) with the standard search. So
nothing special at all.
I've deleted the webpage that is mentioned in the result page the us
Am 11.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
On Wed, 10 May 2017 at 23:37, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Marcus wrote:
However, it doesn't matter. There is no reason to provide download pages
to offer outdated versions - based on w.oo.o. Of course we cannot
inf
> From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com]
> The text there says:
> ...
> ... does not harm the reputation of The Document Foundation;...»
And this is not enough for me, because it can be arbitrarily interpreted.
For example, I was reproached in the forum de.openoffice.info I
Maybe we could start with getting the BuildBots running on Windows 10 -
64bit with the new SDKs...
Regards, Matthias
Am 11.05.2017 um 10:24 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> Hi all
>
> We have anyway to move, because we use very old SDK's
>
> Regards Raphael
>
> Am .05.2017, 10:19 Uhr, schrieb FR web f
Hi all
We have anyway to move, because we use very old SDK's
Regards Raphael
Am .05.2017, 10:19 Uhr, schrieb FR web forum :
+1
With XP and Vista EoL, 32-bit systems are dead.
Issue for AOO: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
64-bit port has been done for LibO.
Process described h
+1
With XP and Vista EoL, 32-bit systems are dead.
Issue for AOO: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
64-bit port has been done for LibO.
Process described here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/msvc-x86_64
- Mail original -
De: "Rory O'Farrell"
À: dev@openoffi
On 5/11/2017 11:01 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I cam across this thread on an Ubuntu forum
> https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2360989
>
> The gist of it is that Win 10 S (out of the box) will not run 32 bit
> applications.
>
> I have not delved into the depths of Windows 10 and Microsoft
I cam across this thread on an Ubuntu forum
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2360989
The gist of it is that Win 10 S (out of the box) will not run 32 bit
applications.
I have not delved into the depths of Windows 10 and Microsoft policy, being a
contented linux user, but if the report
14 matches
Mail list logo
