Am 18.06.2017 um 21:48 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Looks good! ;-)
thanks
I think there is a word missing in the first sentence:
"The data in this table is *based* on download statistics" Should I add it?
Sure, go ahead.
Marcus
Am 18.06.2017 um 21:44 schrieb Marcus:
Am 18.06.2017 um
Hi Marcus,
Looks good! ;-)
I think there is a word missing in the first sentence:
"The data in this table is *based* on download statistics" Should I add it?
Matthias
Am 18.06.2017 um 21:44 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 18.06.2017 um 15:31 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 12.06.2017 um 19:48 schrieb Marcus:
>>>
Am 18.06.2017 um 15:31 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.06.2017 um 19:48 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.06.2017 um 19:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
I just unified it with the other pages, where you preferred that
style... ;-)
sure, the graphics on the other page are smaller. Here the table is
loong. So,
Am 18.06.2017 um 16:47 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Bouncing up your mail from march...
>
> Not only from March, but from March 2016!
Wow, didn't even notice it...
But I must have thought it was important because I kept it in my
archive! ;-)
>
>> Am 27.03.2016 um 22:13
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Bouncing up your mail from march...
Not only from March, but from March 2016!
Am 27.03.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
2) Localization. I got shell access to the Pootle server a few days
ago. I'm still looking around, and if someone else want to join this
is an
Am 12.06.2017 um 19:48 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.06.2017 um 19:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
I just unified it with the other pages, where you preferred that
style... ;-)
sure, the graphics on the other page are smaller. Here the table is
loong. So, putting the text before the table would be
On 6/18/2017 5:51 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 06/17/2017 01:52 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues
have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks.
In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It
On 06/17/2017 01:52 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues
have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks.
In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It depends
on careful checking in the source code
Awesome! Thanks for the Clarification.
Am 18.06.2017 um 10:19 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
In that case, we are talking about the same class. std::array is
defined in header . See
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/array
On 6/17/2017 9:58 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
The book says it is in
In that case, we are talking about the same class. std::array is
defined in header . See
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/array
On 6/17/2017 9:58 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
The book says it is in .
The book is about C++11, providing a quick reference on C++.
I cam across when I saw
Hello all,
John (in CC) suggested to add the Script of Hanya (also in CC) to the
Open Office Release as a first improvement.
On the discussion in this thread @dev declared only stuff that is in
trunc can be part of an release.
Since Hanya has comitter rights granted it was suggested he should
11 matches
Mail list logo
