Re: Blogging

Am 25.03.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Peter Kovacs: I want to blog some stuff, I have decided last week somewhere. But reallity is faster then I am. So I just wanted to have a look at the blog tool. However when I logged in I registered as a new user. Now the blog site does not know I want to blog

Re: Does AOO 4.2.x need new system requirements?

On 26 Mar, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 05:57 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> Kay Schenk wrote: >> > This particular requirement is a source of confusion for me. >> > >> > I'm pretty sure glib 2.5, is some internal RedHat (CentOS5) version >> > numbering scheme.

Re: Does AOO 4.2.x need new system requirements?

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 05:57 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: > > This particular requirement is a source of confusion for me. > > > > I'm pretty sure glib 2.5, is some internal RedHat (CentOS5) version > > numbering scheme. This is really glibc, and we need to

Re: Which C++ language version?

Oha. Learned something new. I will try this! I think we should work in the direction of the standard guideline that is published by Barne Stourstupe. That will lead us to c++11. I think that will prepare us for the future. We move slowly anyway. Am 26. März 2018 08:20:06 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis

Re: Does AOO 4.2.x need new system requirements?

Kay Schenk wrote: This particular requirement is a source of confusion for me. I'm pretty sure glib 2.5, is some internal RedHat (CentOS5) version numbering scheme. This is really glibc, and we need to accurately specify the minimal version we will be requiring. No they are two different

Re: OS/2 drag writer only issue

Hi Matthias, > Hopefully we can see a working version at Warpstock Europe in Berlin? :-) probably even before that :-) And I will miss WSE in Berlin, I have an exam two days later :-( -- Bye, Yuri Dario - To

Re: Which C++ language version?

On 26 Mar, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Don't we use C++ 2003? Good question. That version is not listed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html Under the C++98 section it does mention that the 2003 modifications are supported with -std=c++98 and -std=gnu++98. That version is also not

Re: Which C++ language version?

On 26 Mar, Peter kovacs wrote: > I had to build with -std=c++11 on gcc 7. > C++98 did not work as far as I remeber. > C++17 did lead also to failure I believe. > > So I think we use features from the partial support already. I think we are depending on some GNU extensions to C++98, so our code