Thx...
> On Dec 6, 2020, at 2:39 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 06.12.20 um 16:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
On 07.12.20 08:24, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 07.12.20 08:04, Don Lewis wrote:
On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello all,
I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with.
configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met.
Use
--disable-gtk or install the missing
Hello Peter,
Am 07.12.20 um 07:57 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hi Mechtilde,
>
> check main/saxton/saxton-9.0.0.7-bj.patch
>
> line 147 and 148
>
> +
> +
thanks, yes this works I changed it from 1.4 to 1.6.
Now It stop at the next step building Beanshell
In
/home/mechtilde/openoffice/mai
Hi Mechtilde,
With which version do you build? Java 11?
I try currently with Java 14 and I have another Issue with hsqldb. And
that you can not solve without an update.
Benashell error I can confirm, but I do not have a solution for this at
this time.
On 07.12.20 19:00, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello Peter
I build with Java 11
and HSQLDB is the one of the next candidates :(
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 07.12.20 um 19:16 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hi Mechtilde,
>
> With which version do you build? Java 11?
>
> I try currently with Java 14 and I have another Issue with hsqldb. And
> that y
Hi all,
I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB
(BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2
(EPL1 or MPL2) and Apache Derby (AL2).
Something like SQLLite (PublicD
Hello Peter,
Am 07.12.20 um 19:38 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
> Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB
> (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2
> (EPL1 o
There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is
currently HEAD of master.
Any interest in looking into getting beanshell into some more stable
situation... It looks like it's been majorly refactored.
---
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 7:38 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with
> our ba
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
> Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB
> (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 (EPL1
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mechtilde [mailto:o...@mechtilde.de]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 8:11 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> Am 07.12.20 um 19:38 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
Hello Peter,
Am 07.12.20 um 19:38 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
> Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB
> (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2
> (EPL1 o
Hello Jim
Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is
> currently HEAD of master.
I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this
part works.
Now the build hangs with hsqldb
there I have no su
I agree that eating our own dogfood and using Derby would be the "better" path
to take; plus it is relatively small while at the same time being quite
powerful and compliant.
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kovacs [
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> With both databases, however, Java bothers me - or have we given up the
> intention of making AOO less dependent on Java?
> (yes, of course this is a very long-term question)
But still a good one... personally, SQlite seems like a better,
On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB (BSD).
There are 2 other options in the same weig
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 10:11 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO
>
> I agree that eating our own dogfood and using Derby would be
> the "better" path to take; plus it is relativ
On 07.12.20 22:35, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 10:11 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO
I agree that eating our own dogfood and using Derby would be
the "better" path to
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
>>> Database. Our current strategy is a sma
On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello Jim
Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is
currently HEAD of master.
I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this
part works.
Ok.
Now the b
On 07.12.20 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 7, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
Database. Our current strategy
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>> On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote:
>> Hello Jim
>>
>>> Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what
>>> is currently HEAD of master.
>>
On 07.12.20 23:34, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello Jim
Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is
currently H
On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello Jim
Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is
currently HEAD of master.
I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this
part works.
This is odd.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:38 PM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
> Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB
> (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2
> (EPL1 or MPL
On 12/7/2020 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
> Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB
> (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2
> (EPL1 or MPL2) and Apa
26 matches
Mail list logo
