Hi Matthias,
The same section - "Why get involved with the OpenOffice project?"
https://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html#why-get-involved-with-the-openoffice-project
1st paragraph: "There are many motivations for why volunteers (...)"
is superfluous because it is already where it should
Hi Arrigo,
On 12/9/20 2:51 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello,
trying a shot in the dark...
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 05:24:41PM -, Dick Groskamp wrote:
On 2020/12/09 11:34:03, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Dick,
I have copied it out and it's contents are below.
On 12/9/20 5:42 AM, Dick
Thank you Rony for the Java deep dive.
On 08.12.20 19:11, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
Hmm, just some thoughts and pointers that may be helpful in the context of the
current Java and
possibly HSQL discussions.
Ad Java and OpenOffice
IMHO Java has been fulfilling Sun's original
Hi,
Thanks for finding that. Fixed now!
Regards,
Matthias
Am 09.12.20 um 18:00 schrieb LJ Pilipenko:
> You have a typo on webpage:
>
>
> https://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html
>
>
> In the following sentence 'you' should be 'your'.
>
>
> To help bring the benefits ofOpenOffice to
You have a typo on webpage:
https://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html
In the following sentence 'you' should be 'your'.
To help bring the benefits ofOpenOffice to you country or region
---Your welcome,Mrs P.
Am 09.12.20 um 18:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
How about we create a OpenOffice-Mwiki-ext Repo in gitbox?
We could do the same for the forums customizations.
So we have more control over our support code.
+1
This increases the chance that also others can have a look and give some
hints when
On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jim,
>>
>>>
>>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>>
>>> --with-epm
>>> --with-dmake
>>> --with-beanshell
>>
>> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate
>>
Hello,
trying a shot in the dark...
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 05:24:41PM -, Dick Groskamp wrote:
> On 2020/12/09 11:34:03, Carl Marcum wrote:
> > Hi Dick,
> >
> > I have copied it out and it's contents are below.
> >
> > On 12/9/20 5:42 AM, Dick Groskamp wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020/12/08
Hello Jim, all,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:22:51AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
> >> that some
How about we create a OpenOffice-Mwiki-ext Repo in gitbox?
We could do the same for the forums customizations.
So we have more control over our support code.
All the Best
Peter
On 09.12.20 18:24, Dick Groskamp wrote:
On 2020/12/09 11:34:03, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Dick,
I have copied it
On 2020/12/09 11:34:03, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Dick,
>
> I have copied it out and it's contents are below.
>
> It should be in github or svn but I haven't had time to do anything with it.
>
> On 12/9/20 5:42 AM, Dick Groskamp wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/12/08 18:56:25, Carl Marcum wrote:
> >>
Hello Jim,
I think I understand it nowe clear
Kine regards
Mechtilde
Am 09.12.20 um 16:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>
>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jim,
>>
>>>
>>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>>
>>> --with-epm
>>> --with-dmake
>>> --with-beanshell
Started this morning to fix the pages that are not showing in the DevGuide.
Due to a broken extension tags , and prevent pages from
displaying content.
However, content is there.
Content is editable by tweaking the URL of the not showing page
For instance:
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
>> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
>>
>> For example,
>>
>>
Hi Jim,
Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
>
> For example,
>
> --with-dmake-path
> --with-dmake-url
> --with-epm
> --with-epm-url
>
> Why does
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
>>
>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>
>> --with-epm
>> --with-dmake
>> --with-beanshell
>
> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate
> version like in ext_sources.
Can you provide an
Hello Jim,
Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
>
> For example,
>
> --with-dmake-path
> --with-dmake-url
> --with-epm
> --with-epm-url
>
> Why
Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit
that some things really look like they could/should be fixed.
For example,
--with-dmake-path
--with-dmake-url
--with-epm
--with-epm-url
Why does dmake use dmake-path but EPM just use epm? Why 2 directives when they
could
rigo,
thanks for the great email.. I will be posting my comments/answers inline.
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Dear List,
>
> while working on pull requests, I was wondering how to test the most
> common build options for OpenOffice -- possibly the same used for
>
Hi Dick,
I have copied it out and it's contents are below.
It should be in github or svn but I haven't had time to do anything with it.
On 12/9/20 5:42 AM, Dick Groskamp wrote:
On 2020/12/08 18:56:25, Carl Marcum wrote:
There are still hundreds of broken pages in the dev guide.
Yes it
On 2020/12/08 18:56:25, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> There are still hundreds of broken pages in the dev guide.
> Yes it seems to be idls and ildm tags.
>
> There is a new upgraded VM setup for the wiki waiting to get changed to
> but I had hoped to look into before it get switched over.
> But I
NordMike commented on pull request #110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/110#issuecomment-741613556
Should I rebase it for trunk or is AOO42X OK for now?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
22 matches
Mail list logo
