Re: [Discussion] Would we enable volunteers that develop extensions

>From a legal perspective I think it's best to leave the extensions by themselves. It's like having a parent company and many subsidiaries. If something happens, a particular subsidiary can be cut off without too much damage to the parent company. >From the build/code maintenance perspective, it k

Apache OpenOffice FOSDEM devroom tomorrow (online)

Tomorrow (Saturday) we are at FOSDEM all day, European time. Full schedule and links (top right): https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/track/apache_openoffice/ Talks are pre-recorded but we have live Questions and Answers in Matrix; also, Dave had issues with recording his videos, so the web pres

Re: [Discussion] Would we enable volunteers that develop extensions

On 2/5/2021 3:53 PM, Steve Lubbs wrote: > Just a thought. > > As part of an effort to enable volunteer extension authors would it make > sense to selectively approve extension functionality for inclusion into > AOO on a case by case basis? If it provides a level of new functionality > that is cons

Re: [Discussion] Would we enable volunteers that develop extensions

Just a thought. As part of an effort to enable volunteer extension authors would it make sense to selectively approve extension functionality for inclusion into AOO on a case by case basis? If it provides a level of new functionality that is considered important and compelling, say something t

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on a change in pull request #121: translated various comments

Hi all, Regarding "HTML.vor". >On 2021/02/01 18:46:52, GitBox wrote: > > ardovm commented on a change in pull request #121: > URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568057490 > (...) > > Review comment: >I can find other occurrences of the string `HTML.vor` in

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm edited a comment on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm edited a comment on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774024441 > Is > `if (!!bAutoStyles)` > really the best way to format that logical if for [7af97f4](https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/7af97f4fe332f523912f0174635fb94

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774024441 > Is > `if (!!bAutoStyles)` > really the best way to format that logical if for [7af97f4](https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/7af97f4fe332f523912f0174635fb94d88995f

Re: good daytime whenever you are

Okay, I hate autocorrect sometimes.. I should have proofed it before I sent it sorry. if you create something using openoffice, you own it, open office does not. It is yours. ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Feb 5, 2021, 7:04 AM, at 7:04 AM, Andrew Pitonyak wrote: >Of course, the medium shirts not

Re: good daytime whenever you are

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:52:32 +0600 Naturecheer Naturecheer wrote: > I mean if a saved open office file contains a literary work, can this file > be protected with copyrights by an author of a file under his name? > This is a legal question, and for best information should be posed to a lawyer e

Re: good daytime whenever you are

Of course, the medium shirts not matter ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Feb 5, 2021, 6:23 AM, at 6:23 AM, Naturecheer Naturecheer wrote: >I mean if a saved open office file contains a literary work, can this >file >be protected with copyrights by an author of a file under his name? > >

[GitHub] [openoffice] jimjag commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

jimjag commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-773990932 Is ` if (!!bAutoStyles) ` really the best way to format that logical if for https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122/commits/7af97f4fe332f523912f0174635fb94d8899

good daytime whenever you are

I mean if a saved open office file contains a literary work, can this file be protected with copyrights by an author of a file under his name? Без вирусов. www.avast.com

good day time whenever you are

I've a question for you about your product for example a person is making literary work and exports it as a document of open office, what name copyrights for exported document reserved by, author or by the company of product?

Re: How to cope with duplicate attributes in XML tags

On 05.02.21 08:01, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Hello Peter, All, On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:00:44PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote: +1 for Option 3) [... FTR ...] 3- raise an exception because it is just not acceptable. I believe it should be a subclass of uno::Exception, but... which one? The

Re: imposible to open files

Hi Iouri This problem has been solved in version 4.1.9 which will be released soon. I think that what is unacceptable is that Apple released such a buggy update to the OS. Example https://discussions.apple.com/thread/252174979?page=19 Remember that you are paying to Apple while Apache OpenOffic

Re: imposible to open files

Hello Iouri, Would you please try the release candidate from below link and let us know if it fixes the issue? Please choose the file appropriate for your language of choice. Thank you. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/ On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:42 AM Iouri Tche

RE: imposible to open files

> -Original Message- > From: Iouri Tcherniakov, Toronto, Canada > [mailto:ycher...@yahoo.com.INVALID] > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 6:24 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: imposible to open files > > After installation update from apple, program Big Sure MacOS > versio

imposible to open files

After installation update from apple, program Big Sure MacOS version11.1 Impossible to reopen some files especially one in Exel . Looks like need to switch to apple office. This is unacceptable. Please advise, iouri