[www] OpenOffice download page selects wrong default package on ubuntu 64bit

2012-12-25 Thread Lucas Burson
Hi, First off, Merry Christmas! I found a small issue with the website. The AOO download page detects the OS and architecture and automatically selects the correct binary. However, Google Chrome on Ubuntu 64bit selects RPM instead of DEB (Firefox correctly chooses DEB). Is this easy to change? I

Re: AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-16 Thread Lucas Burson
Ariel, removing all JDK7 worked! Heck yes. This time it failed at VCL: make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/include/jni.h', needed by `/home/ljdelight/aoo/trunk/main/solver/350/unxlngx6.pro/workdir/CxxObject/vcl/source/window/syschild.o'. Stop. I'll double check my

AOO trunk build fails with HSQLDB

2012-12-16 Thread Lucas Burson
Hi, I cannot build AOO from source. I use Ubuntu 64bit. I have never been able to build correctly; I switched from jdk7 to jdk6 and that didn't change anything. I used these instructions, [1], to get things started but I use a different svn url. (off topic: I tried svn-git but it stops responding

Re: Easy task for a first time committer

2012-12-15 Thread Lucas Burson
> To solve this go to file > > main/padmin/source/rtsetup.src How are files like these parsed? For this printer ListBox ('RID_RTS_DEVICE_PRINTLANG_BOX') I found where it is initialized [1]. Then I found resource managers, and [2] which is some class dedicated to resources. But I don't see where th

Re: calc spreadsheet data validate window: 'Value' field not checked

2012-12-10 Thread Lucas Burson
Submitted as enhancement to BZ ([1]). I'll ignore the test case on TestLink. Lucas [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121459 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Lucas Burson wrote: > Can we remove the test from TestLink or should I just mark it as failed? > Sin

Re: calc spreadsheet data validate window: 'Value' field not checked

2012-12-10 Thread Lucas Burson
Can we remove the test from TestLink or should I just mark it as failed? Since it isn't implemented it doesn't make much sense to have it as a regression test. On Dec 9, 2012 11:50 PM, "Zhang Lu" wrote: > Hi Zhu shen, >Sure, it can be implemented as a feature due to workload, thanks! > > On M

calc spreadsheet data validate window: 'Value' field not checked

2012-12-07 Thread Lucas Burson
Hi, I'm doing a regression test on a Calc spreadsheet using data validity for cells. It appears that if you open the validity window (toolbar Data -> Validity) the 'Value' box isn't checked against the allowed type. I don't see it in BZ... but I haven't used search enough to be sure. Or maybe I'm

Re: correct response to finding previous found bug?

2012-12-06 Thread Lucas Burson
> > Yes, it is as a tag and there is a branch for 3.4*, but if you want to > start developing, the best it work directly with trunk (and use git-svn > instead of subversion, it is better for a project this size; I don't > recall if there is somewhere on the building guide a instruction to > check o

Re: correct response to finding previous found bug?

2012-12-06 Thread Lucas Burson
> Good to know. Did you already build OpenOffice? In which platform are > you developing? Nope, I did not build it yet. I did get the AOO4.0 M1 binary release and I've done a few manual tests on TestLink; soon I'll checkout the svn automated tests to see what that's like (looked really easy, someo

Re: correct response to finding previous found bug?

2012-12-04 Thread Lucas Burson
> Do you know C++? Are you willing to dive into the source? I/we can give > a hand and point you where to look. I do know C++ (and xslt, if it's anywhere) and I am willing to play with source. The downside is that I've never worked on a project of this size... so I started with picking up QA stuff

Re: correct response to finding previous found bug?

2012-12-04 Thread Lucas Burson
Well, that got complicated. Thanks for finding that, Ariel. it'll help me find out how this stuff is put together. Can I ask here to get edit privs on AOO bugzilla? On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:52:32A

correct response to finding previous found bug?

2012-12-03 Thread Lucas Burson
Hi, I was doing some regression testing on Ubuntu and discovered a bug which was already reported [1]. It's about 3 months old. That got me wondering, is there some "best practice" (or something) to update a previously found bug? In bugzilla, should I add a comment and update the 'last confirmatio