Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-22 Thread Carl Marcum
On 04/21/2016 08:35 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/21/2016 3:12 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-21 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 4/21/2016 3:12 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-21 Thread Carl Marcum
On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name '*.class' -exec file '{}' ';' -print

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-21 Thread Patricia Shanahan
The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name '*.class' -exec file '{}' ';' -print ./org/openoffice/guno/SpreadsheetExtension.class: compiled

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-21 Thread Patricia Shanahan
After some more testing: It works with JDK1.8 or JRE1.8, 32-bit or 64-bit in each case. However, it fails with the following output using jdk1.7.0_79. Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/OpenOfficeDev/GroovyUNO/test $ !gr groovy *.groovy Apr 21, 2016 10:03:31 AM

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-21 Thread Patricia Shanahan
ct: Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2 [ ... ] []$ gpg --verify guno-extension-0.1.4-r1740035-src.zip.asc gpg: assuming signed data in `guno-extension-0.1.4-r1740035-src.zip' gpg: Signature made Wed 20 Apr 2016 06:20:30 PM EDT using RSA key ID 9553BF9A gpg: Good signatur

RE: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
15:38 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2 > [ ... ] > > []$ gpg --verify guno-extension-0.1.4-r1740035-src.zip.asc > gpg: assuming signed data in `guno-extension-0.1.4-r1740035-src.zip' > gpg: Signature made Wed 2

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-20 Thread Carl Marcum
On 04/20/2016 12:50 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I did a signature check on the files. The md5 checks both passed. The tar.gz.asc check also passed, but the .zip.asc check failed: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/OpenOfficeDev/GroovyUNO/signatures $ gpg --verify

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

2016-04-20 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I did a signature check on the files. The md5 checks both passed. The tar.gz.asc check also passed, but the .zip.asc check failed: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/OpenOfficeDev/GroovyUNO/signatures $ gpg --verify guno-extension-0.1.4-r1740035-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: WARNING: using insecure