Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-23 Thread Marcus
Am 20.04.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/04/2017 Marcus wrote: 2. Major version (X.y.z) But for this it's not working. Here we first need to agree at which point we create a new branch from trunk that will be used for a new major release. We never release from trunk. please read

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-22 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 19.04.2017 um 20:52 schrieb Marcus: > Am 19.04.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Thank you! >> >> But as I understand it, the SVN tag is done after the (last) RC is >> promoted to be final. (That is the point where we know the Revision to >> checkout). So it should be further down in the

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 19/04/2017 Marcus wrote: 2. Major version (X.y.z) But for this it's not working. Here we first need to agree at which point we create a new branch from trunk that will be used for a new major release. We never release from trunk. The initial step when considering a new release is: the relea

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-19 Thread Marcus
Am 19.04.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Thank you! But as I understand it, the SVN tag is done after the (last) RC is promoted to be final. (That is the point where we know the Revision to checkout). So it should be further down in the documentation. ah, yes, please see my answer to An

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-19 Thread Marcus
Am 19.04.2017 um 18:18 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Matthias Seidel wrote: But as I understand it, the SVN tag is done after the (last) RC is promoted to be final. (That is the point where we know the Revision to checkout). So it should be further down in the documentation. Correct. It happens aft

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 19.04.2017 um 18:18 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> But as I understand it, the SVN tag is done after the (last) RC is >> promoted to be final. (That is the point where we know the Revision to >> checkout). So it should be further down in the documentation. > > Correct. It h

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-19 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Matthias Seidel wrote: But as I understand it, the SVN tag is done after the (last) RC is promoted to be final. (That is the point where we know the Revision to checkout). So it should be further down in the documentation. Correct. It happens after a successful vote, and the tag is done retroa

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus, Thank you! But as I understand it, the SVN tag is done after the (last) RC is promoted to be final. (That is the point where we know the Revision to checkout). So it should be further down in the documentation. A little story: Until recently "heise Download" [1] offered only AOO 4.1.

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-17 Thread Marcus
Am 10.04.2017 um 20:38 schrieb Marcus: Thanks for this. My intention was not to get answers to the questions. They were more ment as rough ideas for what could be added to the cook book. ;-) However, I'll take them for addition, but not before Easter. I've added the topics now to the cook book

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-10 Thread Marcus
Thanks for this. My intention was not to get answers to the questions. They were more ment as rough ideas for what could be added to the cook book. ;-) However, I'll take them for addition, but not before Easter. Marcus Am 08.04.2017 um 10:28 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 07/04/2017 Marcus w

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 07/04/2017 Marcus wrote: Am 06.04.2017 um 00:11 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: If it needs to be done early, put it early in the document. Tagging is not to be done early. We tag retroactively, once a RC is approved. I don't care about the Github mirror very much, since it is unofficial, po

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-07 Thread Marcus
Am 06.04.2017 um 18:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 06.04.2017 um 00:01 schrieb Marcus: Am 05.04.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel: I have seen on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases that 4.1.3 (zip/tar.gz) is missing. This seems to be a manual process on SVN [1], so this

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-07 Thread Marcus
Am 06.04.2017 um 00:11 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: If it needs to be done early, put it early in the document. In general, what needs doing should drive the form of the "How to Cook a Release" document. If the current form does not accommodate a necessary step, change it. The objective is to have

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 06.04.2017 um 00:01 schrieb Marcus: > Am 05.04.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> I have seen on GitHub: >> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases >> >> that 4.1.3 (zip/tar.gz) is missing. This seems to be a manual process on >> SVN [1], so this step should be added to our cWiki

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-05 Thread Patricia Shanahan
If it needs to be done early, put it early in the document. In general, what needs doing should drive the form of the "How to Cook a Release" document. If the current form does not accommodate a necessary step, change it. The objective is to have a complete recipe. We currently have two secti

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-05 Thread Marcus
Am 05.04.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel: I have seen on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases that 4.1.3 (zip/tar.gz) is missing. This seems to be a manual process on SVN [1], so this step should be added to our cWiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS

[GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

2017-04-05 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hello all! I have seen on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases that 4.1.3 (zip/tar.gz) is missing. This seems to be a manual process on SVN [1], so this step should be added to our cWiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release @Andrea: I see