Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

Hi, we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file" CU Rainer -

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Yuzhen, all Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing. Here are my findings: There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1 The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as expected. The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Yuzhen Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1? Or do you mean with the full installer? On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Than

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Pedro, I mean the full installation package On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Yuzhen > > Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1? > Or do you mean with the full installer? > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > Could you please

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the > same problem when i

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Pedro, Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi all > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update > patches have

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1)

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US. >From testing perspective: 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical sc

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

No problem found. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin wrote: > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >> On

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the w

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages >>> >>> I have built with

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will >> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages >> >> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future pa

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will > continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages > > I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches > that will allow us for example to upgr

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The whole mechanism is

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:02 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi Jürgen, >>> >>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our u

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Jürgen, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Jürgen, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! >> >> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. >> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some >> fur

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Jürgen, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a firs

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Am 04/02/2014 03:16 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful. Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest. OK, as the bar for accepted showstoppers is now getting ve

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... What a mere chance. :-) Marcus On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, FOLLOW

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2014 um 17:12 schrieb imacat: > Traditional Chinese not found yet. Should I wait for a while? > > you use Linux, correct? Yes please try again later, as mentioned the Linux Upload is ongoing and because of the deb and rpm and 32 and 64 Bit version it takes longer ;-)

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 02.04.2014 17:12, imacat wrote: Traditional Chinese not found yet. Should I wait for a while? As Jürgen wrote, the Linux builds are still being uploaded. Languages starting with a-g are already available for 64bit Linux, other languages and 32bit Linux will follow in a couple of hours.

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Traditional Chinese not found yet. Should I wait for a while? On 2014/04/02 21:16, Jürgen Schmidt said: > Hi, > > FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! > > Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. > We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! > > Last week I proposed a final schedu

[RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from th