On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 07/24/2014 03:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know wha
On 07/24/2014 03:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
attachments? Acco
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
>>> attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process
On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
>> attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
>> attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our pa
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
> attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
> attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our particular instance is
> setup.
>
There are two
Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our particular instance is
setup.
Thanks.
--
