Hi All
In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is
worth reading.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/CMS+Decommissioning+RFC+-+Frequently+Asked+Questions
Remark, due to some disussions, Infra made this disclaimer:
"This is ONLY a request for commen
My concern is that with the proposal the GUI is going away.
On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:09 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi All
>
> In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is
> worth reading.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/CMS+Decommissioning+RFC+-+Freq
Am 03/26/2015 08:09 AM, schrieb jan i:
In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is
worth reading.
[...]
If the CMS were to be decommissioned in the way currently suggested, we
would have a couple of challenges:
- Find a replacement online edtitor for our translato
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/26/2015 08:09 AM, schrieb jan i:
>
>> In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is
>> worth reading.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> If the CMS were to be decommissioned in the way currently suggested, we
>> would have a couple of c
Am 03/27/2015 04:21 PM, schrieb jan i:
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Marcus wrote:
Am 03/26/2015 08:09 AM, schrieb jan i:
In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is
worth reading.
[...]
If the CMS were to be decommissioned in the way currently suggested, we
wou
On 03/27/2015 08:56 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/27/2015 04:21 PM, schrieb jan i:
>> On Friday, March 27, 2015, Marcus wrote:
>>
>>> Am 03/26/2015 08:09 AM, schrieb jan i:
>>>
In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ,
which is
worth reading.
[...]
>>>
