1 3:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 18/01/2021 Steve Lubbs wrote:
So it seems that OS2 is not supported by the AOO project.
Correct.
I assume that the AOO project is not updating the OS2 code.
Wrong (well, kind of...). Yuri Dario is an Apache committer too; and
we did incorporate the last
f so, do have maybe a suggestion what
should be changed or added?
[1] https://www.openoffice.org/porting/index.html
Thanks
Marcus
On 1/20/21 3:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 18/01/2021 Steve Lubbs wrote:
So it seems that OS2 is not supported by the AOO project.
Correct.
I assume that
s not supported by the AOO project.
Correct.
I assume that the AOO project is not updating the OS2 code.
Wrong (well, kind of...). Yuri Dario is an Apache committer too; and
we did incorporate the last changes he did into our source code; and
if he contributes further changes, we will pro
:
So it seems that OS2 is not supported by the AOO project.
Correct.
I assume that the AOO project is not updating the OS2 code.
Wrong (well, kind of...). Yuri Dario is an Apache committer too; and
we did incorporate the last changes he did into our source code; and
if he contributes fu
On 18/01/2021 Steve Lubbs wrote:
So it seems that OS2 is not supported by the AOO project.
Correct.
I assume that the AOO project is not updating the OS2 code.
Wrong (well, kind of...). Yuri Dario is an Apache committer too; and we
did incorporate the last changes he did into our source
> -Original Message-
> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:45 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Who is the Project? was: OS2 code
>
> Hello,
>
> Your question is valis. But the
Hello,
Your question is valis. But the answer is might be a little fuzzy.
From a formal view an Apache Project needs a PMC with some members and
some committers (all PMC members are "committers", but some committers
might not be PMC members).
But that is not the whole truth, esp. not for the
On 19.01.21 22:00, Steve Lubbs wrote:
On 1/18/21 6:03 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
The Project does accept bug reports. And Code testing and bug fixing
is done by bitworks.
That's the part I was missing.
Maybe it is that there is a Fuzziness on who is the Project? Who
releases the Community bi
On 1/18/21 6:03 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
The Project does accept bug reports. And Code testing and bug fixing is
done by bitworks.
That's the part I was missing.
Maybe it is that there is a Fuzziness on who is the Project? Who
releases the Community binary version? Who releases the binary OS/
as far as it is usefull.
Removing the OS2 code from future versions is not the same as making
it unavailable. It will continue to be available in earlier versions.
This can be elucidated on the porting page.
Besides the points I've already made, keeping the OS2 code in the
reposito
effort the code
will inevitably become stale, including the build. Unfortunately the
only way to determine this is to build it and test it which brings us
back to some level of maintenance.
So please keep the OS/2 code as far as it is usefull.
Removing the OS2 code from future versions is not
Am 18.01.21 um 18:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 18.01.21 um 18:33 schrieb Marcus:
Am 18.01.21 um 04:01 schrieb Steve Lubbs:
To begin with the use of the phrase "third-party port" in this
context indicates to me that a coding/testing activity is required to
support the target of the port which
Hi,
Am 18.01.21 um 18:33 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 18.01.21 um 04:01 schrieb Steve Lubbs:
>> To begin with the use of the phrase "third-party port" in this
>> context indicates to me that a coding/testing activity is required to
>> support the target of the port which is not being done by the AOO
>> pr
Am 18.01.21 um 04:01 schrieb Steve Lubbs:
To begin with the use of the phrase "third-party port" in this context
indicates to me that a coding/testing activity is required to support
the target of the port which is not being done by the AOO project.
Here are the statements on the page (that ma
Hi,
I think we have to differ between responsibility and merit and support.
On the webpage we IMO have to clarify we are not responsible for the
OS/2 port and the merits belong to others.
But in our code we IMO should do what is in our potentials to support
such a port.
So please keep the
is tells who the third party doing the port is.
**
So it seems that OS2 is not supported by the AOO project. I assume that
the AOO project is not updating the OS2 code. So a porting organization
would need to make changes to the OS2 code that existed at the time OS2
was last supported. It would m
Steve, when you think that the text on [1] leads to the impression that
AOO for OS/2 is dead maybe something with the wording is wrong.
So, please let us rethink to update the webpage to eleminate this
impression.
[1] https://www.openoffice.org/porting/index.html
Thanks
Marcus
Am 10.01.2
Thanks for correcting me. :-[
On 1/9/21 3:43 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Steve,
Where did you get the idea from? ;-)
AOO 4.1.8 is released for OS/2 and OS/2 based systems:
https://www.bitwiseworks.com/products/ports.php#AOO
I am running it in a VM on ArcaOS 5.
https://www.arcanoae.com/
R
Hi Steve,
Where did you get the idea from? ;-)
AOO 4.1.8 is released for OS/2 and OS/2 based systems:
https://www.bitwiseworks.com/products/ports.php#AOO
I am running it in a VM on ArcaOS 5.
https://www.arcanoae.com/
Regards,
Matthias
Am 09.01.21 um 23:40 schrieb Steve Lubbs:
> According
According to this page, https://www.openoffice.org/porting/index.html,
OS2 is no longer supported. Isn't it time we remove the OS2-specific
code from the code base? BTW, OS2 was my favorite OS back in the day.
Steve Lubbs
20 matches
Mail list logo
