On 11 March 2015 at 10:33, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As it seems that I will be retired in advance (4 years) in July, I will
have more time and I plan to join another project. As this project uses a
different licence (CC-BY-SA 3.0), I would use for my original
Waterval [mailto:waterval@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 04:41
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Double licence ALv2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0
Hi Michael,
Hi all,
2015-03-11 12:14 GMT+01:00 RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
[...]
But: if a user creates a derived work
Hi Dennis,
Hi all,
2015-03-11 17:53 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org:
Is it correct to assume that we are speaking of documentation
+1
and, specifically, material for the OpenOffice.org wiki and web site?
-1
If the idea is to maintain the core material on only one
On 11.03.2015 10:53, jan i wrote:
On 11 March 2015 at 10:33, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As it seems that I will be retired in advance (4 years) in July, I will
have more time and I plan to join another project. As this project uses a
different licence (CC-BY-SA
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de
wrote:
On 11.03.2015 10:53, jan i wrote:
On 11 March 2015 at 10:33, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Hi all,
As it seems that I will be retired in advance (4 years) in July, I will
have
Hi Michael,
Hi all,
2015-03-11 12:14 GMT+01:00 RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
[...]
But: if a user creates a derived work and puts it unter CC-BY_SA only,
Apache can't use the derived work.
(Use includes also improve and share.)
So the problem is the use of improvements.
