Yes, NOT A BUG is definitely preferable to INVALID.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 02:56 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Question about: OpenOffice Calc. "=-1^2" like e
g is to rename "INVALID" so it is less offensive?
Maybe NOT-A-BUG or something like that? But still preserve the
distinction between that at WONTFIX.
Regards,
-Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 05:
quired
to be that way).
-Original Message-
From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 05:21 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about: OpenOffice Calc. "=-1^2" like expressions
On Mon, 27 May 2013 14:08:15 +0200
Andrea
27.05.2013, 16:16, "Regina Henschel" :
>
> My personal favorite is the way Gnumeric does it. It puts brackets
> around -1 when you enter the formula, so that there is no doubt about
> the meaning.
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
It looks currently like best solution without misunderstanding from vi
On 27.05.2013 14:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Andre Fischer wrote:
In any case, this is a problem with no good solution.
Indeed. Before this becomes another 0 ^ 0... there is an issue for
this, it dates back to 2004 and it is marked invalid. That's it.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.c
Thanks to all for explanations
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On Mon, 27 May 2013 14:08:15 +0200
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Andre Fischer wrote:
> > In any case, this is a problem with no good solution.
>
> Indeed. Before this becomes another 0 ^ 0... there is an issue for this,
> it dates back to 2004 and it is marked invalid. That's it.
>
> https://issue
Hi,
please see the (long) discussions in
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24271 and
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=26755 and its duplicates.
Torokhov Sergey schrieb:
There is a some strange behaviour in "OpenOffice Calc" (and in
Microsoft Office too). Did it was m
Andre Fischer wrote:
In any case, this is a problem with no good solution.
Indeed. Before this becomes another 0 ^ 0... there is an issue for this,
it dates back to 2004 and it is marked invalid. That's it.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24271
If someone has strong feelings h
On 27.05.2013 13:33, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in "OpenOffice Calc" (and in Microsoft Office
too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#
Hi,
On 27.05.2013 11:20, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in "OpenOffice Calc" (and in
Microsoft Office too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability
with MSO?
This seems to concern all combinations of even degrees and "minus"
sign in the begining of formula
1.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
> There is a some strange behaviour in "OpenOffice Calc" (and in Microsoft
> Office too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Exceptions_to_the_standard
The behavior or
On 2013/05/27 11:20 AM, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in "OpenOffice Calc" (and in Microsoft Office
too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
This seems to concern all combinations of even degrees and "minus" sign in the
begining of formula
1.
13 matches
Mail list logo
