Am 06/21/2013 12:15 AM, schrieb Manuel del Valle:
sorry, I've now seen the broken download link. It seems Windows is not
always named "Windows" in the browser strings but also "Win" or "Win32".
I've fixed this. Please test again on:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
h
>
> sorry, I've now seen the broken download link. It seems Windows is not
> always named "Windows" in the browser strings but also "Win" or "Win32".
>
> I've fixed this. Please test again on:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/d
Am 06/20/2013 10:16 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 06/20/2013 09:58 PM, schrieb Manuel del Valle:
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that I tested this with my FF 21.0 in
Win7 and the link says:
"Download Apache OpenOffice 4.0.0
Click here for the most recent version for and Español."
and p
Am 06/20/2013 09:21 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 20/06/2013 01:22, Fernando Cassia a écrit :
You dont say if you downloaded FF using your distro s package manager, or
if you went to mozilla.org and manually downloaded it.
That makes a huge difference, as I suspect Firefox versions downloaded
fr
Am 06/20/2013 09:58 PM, schrieb Manuel del Valle:
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that I tested this with my FF 21.0 in Win7 and
the link says:
"Download Apache OpenOffice 4.0.0
Click here for the most recent version for and Español."
and points to: "/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apac
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that I tested this with my FF 21.0 in Win7 and
the link says:
"Download Apache OpenOffice 4.0.0
Click here for the most recent version for and Español."
and points to: "/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0__es"
My "analyze" results are:
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that I tested this with my FF 21.0 in Win7 and
the link says:
"Download Apache OpenOffice 4.0.0
Click here for the most recent version for and Español."
and points to: "/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0__es"
My "analyze" results are:
Le 20/06/2013 01:22, Fernando Cassia a écrit :
You dont say if you downloaded FF using your distro s package manager, or
if you went to mozilla.org and manually downloaded it.
That makes a huge difference, as I suspect Firefox versions downloaded from
a distro s repos are much more likely to inc
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> My system is Xubuntu 13.04 64bit and I use the beta version of FF.
>
> Hagar
>
Hi Hagar,
You dont say if you downloaded FF using your distro s package manager, or
if you went to mozilla.org and manually downloaded it.
That makes a huge diff
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/19/2013 12:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Am 06/18/2013 11:53 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>>>
wrote:
Th
Am 06/19/2013 12:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 06/18/2013 11:53 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Thanks for the data. Here you can see for yourself that nothing points to
Ubuntu or at least t
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/18/2013 11:53 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the data. Here you can see for yourself that nothing points to
>>> Ubuntu or at least to a Debian based Linux distro. Un
Am 06/18/2013 11:53 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Thanks for the data. Here you can see for yourself that nothing points to
Ubuntu or at least to a Debian based Linux distro. Unfortunatelly there is
no way to make a correct download suggestion. So, I
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Thanks for the data. Here you can see for yourself that nothing points to
> Ubuntu or at least to a Debian based Linux distro. Unfortunatelly there is
> no way to make a correct download suggestion. So, I don't know how to fix
> this problem.
Thanks for the data. Here you can see for yourself that nothing points
to Ubuntu or at least to a Debian based Linux distro. Unfortunatelly
there is no way to make a correct download suggestion. So, I don't know
how to fix this problem.
Marcus
Am 06/14/2013 09:54 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 14/06/2013 17:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
I was checking the download process for MD5checksum verification and I
noticed that the download page proposes a 64bit RPM file whereas my system
is Ubuntu and should give a 64bit DEB.
Hence when clic
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> I was checking the download process for MD5checksum verification and I
> noticed that the download page proposes a 64bit RPM file whereas my system
> is Ubuntu and should give a 64bit DEB.
> Hence when clicking the MD5checksum link, the wrong
17 matches
Mail list logo
