Re: Test builds for Windows

Hi, I uploaded a new version on Sunday. Regards, Matthias Am 29.06.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Dick Groskamp: > Matthias, > > would you build me a nl version ? > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Is this: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176 is fixed with 4.1.4? I can't test cause I don't have Windows 32-bit. - Mail original - De: "Jörg Schmidt" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Juin 2017 21:32:16 Objet: i have tested (was: Test builds

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Hmm, seems my fun LVL is low. It is just an advert. It is fine if you like it your way. But I really really recommend you take at least a look. Maybe it has some ideas for you. Since the tool is only a PowerShell script. And Windows install mechanics need some love... ;) All the best Peter Am

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:peter.kov...@posteo.de] > Windows98 is not a good reference in total. > I would only compare it to the NT series. And all of them > where stable depending what you install. My statement was just a joke. Of course it is not right to compare Windows 98SE directly wit

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Windows98 is not a good reference in total. I would only compare it to the NT series. And all of them where stable depending what you install. I would like to advertise Chocolatey, the Windows Paket Manager. It is really the way to go if you want to do server based installations. All the best P

Re: Test builds for Windows

Hi again Mathias The Portuguese 1793492 build does not include the latest dictionary (available since May 29th) Can you fix this? Confirmed! It is in trunk, but not (yet) in the 414 branch. This will be corrected! Thanks! I am quoting (from configure.ac): --enable-win-x64-shellext En

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > >> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-) > >> http://www.7-zip.de/ > > OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything > is fine now. > > 7-zip 9.20 i

Re: Test builds for Windows

Hi Pedro, Am 29.06.2017 um 22:49 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Mathias > > Thank you for the test builds. > > The Portuguese 1793492 build does not include the latest dictionary > (available since May 29th) > Can you fix this? Confirmed! It is in trunk, but not (yet) in the 414 branch. This will be c

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Am 29.06.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > > >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] >> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-) >> http://www.7-zip.de/ > OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything is fine now. 7-zip 9.20 is almost 7 years old. Only

Re: Test builds for Windows

Hi Mathias Thank you for the test builds. The Portuguese 1793492 build does not include the latest dictionary (available since May 29th) Can you fix this? Note: The coming build will include shell extensions for Windows 64bit (--enable-win-x64-shellext) What is the advantage? Regards, Pe

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-) > http://www.7-zip.de/ OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything is fine now. Jörg - To unsubsc

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Am 29.06.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] >> Why unpack it? > because it is more convenient, if I want to make a server installation (setup > /a) afterwards. > I can do the extraction to the desired directory without having to choo

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Why unpack it? because it is more convenient, if I want to make a server installation (setup /a) afterwards. I can do the extraction to the desired directory without having to choose, because the right command is in the context me

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Am 29.06.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > Hello, > >> I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages. > Thank you. > > I have tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Win_x86_install_de.exe, no problems. That sounds good! > But I have made a strange observation: > If I try to u

i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

Hello, > I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages. Thank you. I have tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Win_x86_install_de.exe, no problems. But I have made a strange observation: If I try to unpack the installation package with 7Zip does not work, but there is an er

Re: Test builds for Windows

Sure! Feel free to download and test... ;-) Your feedback is welcome. Regards, Matthias Am 29.06.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Dick Groskamp: > Matthias, > > would you build me a nl version ? > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

re: Test builds for Windows

Matthias, would you build me a nl version ? -- DiGro ___ Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 (Dutch) and scanned with Ziggo extended security (F-Secure) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache

Test builds for Windows

Hi at all, I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages. (This is done mainly to see if my VM with Windows 10 can handle it and how long it takes) If you want to test a language which is not currently listed here: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-414-Test