Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Jim, Feel free to do so... ;-) But I am not sure if Twitter is the right "audience" for a Developer Build. (BTW: I canceled my account there recently) Regards,    Matthias Am 27.12.22 um 12:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Should we post something on Twitter about Dev4 availability? > >> On Dec

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Should we post something on Twitter about Dev4 availability? > On Dec 25, 2022, at 4:03 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, All, > > Merry Christmas to all around here! > > Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded... > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb M

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Jim, All, Merry Christmas to all around here! Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded... Regards,    Matthias Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Great! > > I am rebuilding now for Windows. > > Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep > everything

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Great! I am rebuilding now for Windows. Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep everything at #18ec844f88. Can you please tag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X then. Regards,    Matthias Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Yep! Just fin

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Yep! Just finished building and uploading! > On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful? > > I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev. > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 22

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Jim, it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful? I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev. Regards,    Matthias Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes > are in

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path. > On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if > code changes are needed? >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if code changes are needed? Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get > AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve > t

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve these issues. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

My macOS Catalina build server VM is very unreliable... working on getting it back in shape. > On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > > Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Windows builds (a46cde238b) are uploaded now: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev4/binaries/ Regards,    Matthias Am 21.12.22 um 14:11 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > Thanks, my Windows build

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will probably upload before me! ;-) I think we should also hash the builds as we have done for Dev3, since they are semi-official. Regards,    Matthias > >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi jim, Am 21.12.22 um 12:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > No changes to the Linux or Windows builds, so the small change in hash# isn't > an issue since this is an informal Dev4 test So how do we tag it? Uploads go here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev4/binaries/ I wil

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

No changes to the Linux or Windows builds, so the small change in hash# isn't an issue since this is an informal Dev4 test > On Dec 20, 2022, at 8:39 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts > AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? > >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Am 20.12.22 um 14:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts > AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? Should have done git pull first... ;-) #a46cde238b Matthias > > Regards, > >    Matthias > > Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> T

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Jim, I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? Regards,    Matthias Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: > > https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ macOS builds are on-going

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Had to reboot the VM... > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > failed to download > https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download > at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line > 519. > > Hmmm > >> On

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

failed to download https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 519. Hmmm > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this wee

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week > On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > I have some free time next week. > > How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ? Sorry, since we want to build AOO

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Jim, Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. I have some free time next week. How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ? Regards,    Matthias > >> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >>

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

I can't get 4.2.X to build in Ubuntu 18.04.6 x64 I'm using ./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" --with-dmake-url=https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz --with-epm-url=https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0/epm-5.0.0.tar.gz

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Matthias So, at that time we build from the source contained in the archive (aka tag)? That makes sense! Thanks! Pedro > On 11/08/2022 9:32 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi Matthias > > > >> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matth

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Pedro, Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > >> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. >> No need to wait, you can always build your own version. > Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Matthias > On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > > I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. > > No need to wait, you can always build your own version. Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). But the idea was to do th

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Pedro, Am 07.11.22 um 15:30 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > > +1 > I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. No need to wait, you can always build your own version. Regards,    Matthias > > Best, > Pedro > >> On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. I hope that others have something to contribute. Otherwise Dev4 will be just "another" snapshot. But even then, we can prepare Dev5 afterwards. Step by step to the 4.2.0 relea

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, all, > > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. > > I will use these two g

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Jim, all, Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/ > Is HEAD of AOO42X in

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi Matthias, all +1 I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. Best, Pedro > On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago. > Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? > > Regarding Windows, I would like

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be added before we build? > On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago. >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, We released our last Developer version some time ago. Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as a "Developer Version". This way we are much closer to a production build. Additionally, I would like to bu

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, We released our last Developer version some time ago. Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as a "Developer Version". This way we are much closer to a production build. Additionally, I would like to bu

Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Hi all, We released our last Developer version some time ago. Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as a "Developer Version". This way we are much closer to a production build. Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums Op