Mohammad Alhammouri schrieb:
Hello there,
is there a similar function to the page number function
xPageCursor.getPage(),
that finds the paragraph number within the text document.
if not is there any way to find that number in JAVA ?
thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mohammad.
hi,
i am not
July 17th, 15pm - 15.30pm
Participants: Mathias Bauer, Thorsten Ziehm (QA),
Martin Hollmichel
This group meet on Mondays 3pm German time on regular basis, please
contact me if there is the need to raise any issues for the next release
in this forum, we try to move to irc then or at least try to
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 06:04:41PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Now that CWS warnings01 is integrated and most of the OOo modules are
C/C++ warning free for the
On the 17th of July 2006, the Chinese, Japanese and Korean
native-language projects of OpenOffice.org have decided to join forces
to form the Asian CJK Native-Language Group of OpenOffice.org*. Mr Hirano
Kazunari will act as the communications technical coordinator of the
group.
This group will
Good luck.
Jianhua
On 7/18/06, Charles Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 17th of July 2006, the Chinese, Japanese and Korean
native-language projects of OpenOffice.org have decided to join forces
to form the Asian CJK Native-Language Group of OpenOffice.org*. Mr Hirano
Kazunari will act
Hi Carsten,
On 7/14/06, Carsten Driesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can see that the configuration set Factories contains nodes for
every appplication module, in the example
com.sun.star.frame.StartModule and com.sun.star.text.TextDocument.
The property called ooSetupFactoryWindowAttributes
2006/7/18, Stephan Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As you wrote in comment 3 to issue 66577 that gcc 4.0 generates warnings
or stuff like this
void f(com::sun::star::uno::Any const a) {
sal_Bool b;
if (a = b) {
// warning if b is used here
}
}
To me (I have no
Congrantulations!
Charles Schulz 写道:
On the 17th of July 2006, the Chinese, Japanese and Korean
native-language projects of OpenOffice.org have decided to join forces
to form the Asian CJK Native-Language Group of OpenOffice.org*. Mr Hirano
Kazunari will act as the communications technical
Hi,
please correct me, if I am wrong. I understand this as a 'C' inherited
C++ oddity (no constructors for integral values), which leads to a
warning if the first operation on the integral value is not classified
as assignment. Obviously 'operator =' has not been classified as
assignment at
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi,
please correct me, if I am wrong. I understand this as a 'C' inherited
C++ oddity (no constructors for integral values), which leads to a
warning if the first operation on the integral value is not classified
as assignment. Obviously 'operator ='
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
[...]
C2 (M2, M3, M4): Create one CWS for the 20 wntmsci10 modules, svx, and
desktop. Testing will be somewhat expensive. We should start this
early and see we can integrate early in 2.0.5 timeframe. This could be
distributed between three persons, one each for
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi,
please correct me, if I am wrong. I understand this as a 'C' inherited
C++ oddity (no constructors for integral values), which leads to a
warning if the first operation on the integral value is not classified
as
Xu, Shenshen wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Could anybody tell me what is the meaning of the return value of
IMPL_LINK, I found some of the codes return 0L and few of the codes
return 1L, I wonder what the difference is ?
The meaning is that returning 0 means that the link wasn't executed
Thomas Schaap wrote:
Also, I couldn't find exactly what is being hashed for this checksum.
I'm suspecting it's the unencrypted version of the file, so one can
quickly see whether the decryption was succesful using a particular
password. Am I correct here? The ODF standard is not quite clear
I propose a change to the wording on the website to refer to the Linux
build as Linux_x86 to differentiate it from a Linux_x64 build.
The wording for Windows is fine as is because 64 bit Windows runs 32 bit
software out of the box.
Hi Stephan,
So, it seems that we have used the wrong operator here. Therefor I tend
to agree to Frank, that we may want to fix this.
The choice of operator is indeed unfortunate. However, I do not agree that
- T b;
+ T b = T();
is in general a fix that improves code quality.
16 matches
Mail list logo
