Re: [dev] configmgr re-factor ...

Hi Mathias, On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:47 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: > I don't remember what the proposed use cases for this > architecture were. According to Joerg - StarPortal :-) it's a valid concern, but IMHO there are perhaps better ways to share data across processes, and well - I th

Re: [dev] Vista did not Support

Utomo wrote: > I read in the Inno setup update > http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Inno_Setup/1018011974/1 > That Vista (RC2) did NOT support the HTML help format ( WinHelp based help > files) > > as I remember now the OOo 2.x Already use the XML help file. > But, Just want to make sure, is

Re: [dev] Vista did not Support

From: "Utomo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:02:15 +0700 > That Vista (RC2) did NOT support the HTML help format ( WinHelp based help > files) We do not use WinHelp. -- Pavel Janík New (actually useful) features; can you say "Apple"? -- Daniel Egger

Re: [dev] Fontwork question

Alan Yaniger wrote: Hi list-members, I've gotten a problem importing MS WordArt objects when the text is CTL. The font is lost. In Writer it just chooses the default CTL font, and in Impress and Calc the font is incorrect as well. I see that when importing the document, OOo recognized the fo

Re: [dev] Wiki Extension: ParserFunctions

Stefan, Michael, is one of you taking care of this, or if it is not feasible, could you comment? Thanks Kay Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Hi again, sorry for bothering, but could we again add some extensions to the OOo wiki (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page)

Re: [dev] Valgrind automatic tests for accessability

Hi Caolan, Caolan McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:05 +0200, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Hi Mathias, Mathias Bauer wrote: Code coverage is one thing (and it's only status quo!), code behavior another. Does just switching on a11y support in the configuration *without actually using it* reall

Re: [dev] Valgrind automatic tests for accessability

On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:05 +0200, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Mathias Bauer wrote: > > Code coverage is one thing (and it's only status quo!), code behavior > > another. Does just switching on a11y support in the configuration > > *without actually using it* really make the testing wi

Re: [dev] Valgrind automatic tests for accessability

Hi Mathias, Mathias Bauer wrote: Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Hi Caolan, the Automated Testing Team by Sun tried with TestTool to identify a code coverage with their test scripts. They ran the tests with accessibility enabled or disabled on the system. The result in our environment was the same.