[dev] Helpneeded with Issue 82446

2007-10-24 Thread Olaf Felka
Hi, I have an issue that has been unfortunately 'confirmed' by votes: 82446. On Vista OOo comes up with a dialog with only an OK button [1]. Nothing else happens, no regular Office start. I have no idea what might cause the problem. Do you know the cause or have any hint? Groetjes, Olaf

[dev] crack-addled string hackery fun

2007-10-24 Thread Caolan McNamara
I was playing around with strings to see if there was a route to elide the constructors of OString and OUStrings especially for global const strings initialised during startup So e.g. static const CONST_AGG_OSTRING(sGlobal, ::); and static const CONST_AGG_OUSTRING(TMP, TMP); which are,

[dev] build failed in cli_ure

2007-10-24 Thread satish bejgum
Hello I'm trying build sourcecode 680m233 in Windows XP. I have configured build and run bootstap ./configure --with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003/Common7/Vc7 --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_05 --with-mspdb-path=/cygdrive/c/Program

[dev] VOS removal

2007-10-24 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi, VOS is a deprecated module (library), and all its functionality is handled in SAL these days. Indeed, VOS is now in fact just a wrapper over SAL's functions/classes. I wonder: Is anybody against removing it for good? I'm now in VCL, going quite quickly, but in case somebody is against

Re: [dev] VOS removal

2007-10-24 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Michael, On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Michael Meeks wrote: VOS is a deprecated module (library), and all its functionality is handled in SAL these days. Indeed, VOS is now in fact just a wrapper over SAL's functions/classes. I wonder: Is anybody against removing it for good? I'm

Re: [dev] VOS removal

2007-10-24 Thread Philipp Lohmann
Hi, while I`d generally agree, there is the infamous Solarmutex of vcl which is a derivative of the vos::IMutex interface and needs that to do refcounting. I don`t think sal`s Mutex class has virtual methods. Of course you could move that interface out of vos to vcl, if the SolarMutex is

Re: [dev] VOS removal

2007-10-24 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Philipp, while I`d generally agree, there is the infamous Solarmutex of vcl which is a derivative of the vos::IMutex interface and needs that to do refcounting. I don`t think sal`s Mutex class has virtual methods. Of course you could move that interface out of vos to vcl, if the