Re: [dev] charter discussion ?

Hi, From my perspective with active code contributor a people described, who constantly contribute code to the project under the general rules of the project, [including SCA, cws-process] Is this something we can agree on as being an active code contributor for OpenOffice.org ? +1 Best regar

Re: [dev] charter discussion ?

Hi *, On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Martin Hollmichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > regarding the new draft of the charter > () > there is a paragraph 4.1.1 "Three "Code Contributor Representatives" > [...]

Re: [dev] charter discussion ?

Hi, I know that this does not address the concerns regarding the discussion who's electable for the council but I also think that this is not the main point to get the CC to get the work done. From my experience from the last years in the CC I just can say that I'm not able to follow _and_ t

[dev] OOO300_m5/DEV300_m31 do not compile on Solaris

Hi! Since the OOO300_m5/DEV300_m31 the Buildbot Solaris build machines do not properly build these milestones. The build failes with the following error message: "= Building module solenv Running processes: 1 /space1/termite/slavedir/Solaris-Intel/workdir/solenv +