Re: [dev] Additional toughts about crash reporting, WAS: Re: [dev] crash reporter, what are the various distro's strategies ?

2007-05-18 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 17:34 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote: > Caolan McNamara wrote: > > Well I'd foresee that it would be up to each distro to look at their own > > stacktraces so I don't see that occurring, but I don't have a feel for > > the scale of how many reports might be in question. > > Yeah

Re: [dev] Additional toughts about crash reporting, WAS: Re: [dev] crash reporter, what are the various distro's strategies ?

2007-05-18 Thread Bernd Eilers
Caolan McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:23 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote: Caolan McNamara wrote: Hi Caolan, ReHi, As far as I have heard there are distributions which currently do not release from MasterWorkspaces or ChildWorkspaces but do in fact use some kind of more or less compl

Re: [dev] Additional toughts about crash reporting, WAS: Re: [dev] crash reporter, what are the various distro's strategies ?

2007-05-18 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:23 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote: > Caolan McNamara wrote: > > Hi Caolan, > > As far as I have heard there are distributions which currently do not > release from MasterWorkspaces or ChildWorkspaces but do in fact use some > kind of more or less complex system to release so

[dev] Additional toughts about crash reporting, WAS: Re: [dev] crash reporter, what are the various distro's strategies ?

2007-05-18 Thread Bernd Eilers
Caolan McNamara wrote: Hi Caolan, [... snip ...] What I'm thinking about aiming at is a shared cross-distro crash repository where we can auto submit the distro OOo crashes, and the distros can plug in their various stack mappers, with quick and dirty gnomebugzilla-alike tooling to merge the d