Niklas Nebel wrote:
No trace means it's used: .IF $(WITH_GPC)!=NO
Yep (where the relevant part is in the
tools/source/generic/makefile.mk). So my memory *did* fail me. ;)
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Mathias Bauer wrote:
gpc is no longer needed (for a looong time).
Are you sure? You are right that OOo can be built without gpc (with the
option to disable it), but no developer could tell me if that will
create a loss of functionality or not. Kai Ahrens told me that he is
going to make
On 07/22/09 09:00, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
all distros I know of are using the non-gpc clipper since ages, I'm
not aware of any regressions there. Also, if my memory does not fail
me, Hamburg switched to non-gpc for 3.0, at least I don't find any
traces of WITH_GPC in solenv anymore.
No trace
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Terrence, *,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Terrence Millerterren...@sbcglobal.net
wrote:
any source information needed to do a build should be in a source file and
stored locally.
No. That differs from system to system and thus cannot be stored in a
I am about half way through my first build and have already run into things
which could lead to unstable Linux builds: My experience has convinced
me that
any source information needed to do a build should be in a source file
and stored locally.
Examples of information that should be in a
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Terrence
Millerterren...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
SNIP
Examples of information that should be in a source files are:
- A list of all the packages which need to be installed in order for the
build to succeed.
configure checks
