Agreed. Let's change it into a kill MSVC 7.1 party instead .. ;-)
Kai
On 23 Jan 2007 11:42:35 +0100, Thorsten Behrens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kai,
you wrote:
Could you run those same tests on a local disk? It would be fun to
see if it's only you Sun guys who have NFS who are taking the
Hi Kai,
you wrote:
Could you run those same tests on a local disk? It would be fun to
see if it's only you Sun guys who have NFS who are taking the hit ..
:-)
Heh ;-)
Aren't you planning a similar setup for a highly parallel build
cluster? I expect the relative increase in build time to
Hi *,
so - finally got around doing some build-time benchmarking.
Setup:
NFS volume on Solaris10, 4NT build on WinXP SP2, Opteron 2.2GHz
machine, 100MBps NIC, msvc 7.1.
Both src solver on the remote volume, as well as compiler. This
should be about the worst-case scenario we've got here in
Could you run those same tests on a local disk? It would be fun to
see if it's only you Sun guys who have NFS who are taking the hit ..
:-)
Kai
On 22 Jan 2007 19:33:33 +0100, Thorsten Behrens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
so - finally got around doing some build-time benchmarking.
Setup:
Hi Thorsten,
On Friday 22 December 2006 16:34, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
http://www.go-oo.org/ooo-build/bin/strip-guards
is the script to run over your sources (give it path to them as a
parameter).
http://www.go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/src680/strip-guards-additions.diff
is a patch to be
Jan Holesovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So - everything is ready ;-)
[snip]
Please test - I'm eager to see the results with msvc ;-)
Thanks a bunch - will do!
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi Thosten,
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 21:40, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
you wrote:
I hate them that much that I am willing to do a script that would do
the removal ;-)
What is the platform/compiler that probably needs this, please? Any
volunteer to do a comparison of the with and
Jens-Heiner Rechtien schrieb:
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 11:46, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kai Backman wrote:
Aah. Let me rephrase. Are -you- really sure the external include guard
optimization provides enough benefit on all the compilers we are using
to make it
Hi Nikolai,
On Thursday 21 December 2006 13:17, Nikolai Pretzell wrote:
The one remaining compiler is Microsoft Visual
Studio. There are varying reports if this compiler has a build-in
include guard optimization or not.
According to Oliver Bolte, in version 8, the MSVC compiler uses
Nikolai Pretzell wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien schrieb:
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 11:46, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kai Backman wrote:
Aah. Let me rephrase. Are -you- really sure the external include
guard
optimization provides enough benefit on all the compilers
On 12/21/06, Nikolai Pretzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is: From today on, we use internal include guards only.
...
What do you think?
Sounds good to me. :-)
Kohei
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Kendy,
you wrote:
I hate them that much that I am willing to do a script that would do
the removal ;-)
What is the platform/compiler that probably needs this, please? Any
volunteer to do a comparison of the with and without compilation
times?
That would be msvc
Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please remember to do the timings against remote volumes.
Hi Heiner,
sure - I'll take the worst-case scenario with remote solver remote
modules.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
-
To
13 matches
Mail list logo
