Alon,
I have followed your discussion in
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39382.
Thanks for offering help on improving certificate usage :)
I just want to make sure that we all know the details:
OOo should be a user of PKI infrastructure, but not the maintainer.
On Windows it's
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 12:00 schrieb Malte Timmermann:
> We think that most people on non-Windows platforms will have their
> personal certificate in some Mozilla profile anyway.
Not true.
I had to extra set up to Mozilla and import a test-generated certificate
to test the XML Sec stuf
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap
If you want to be taken serious you should stop to use offending words
like the ones above. If you have some valid complaints about Mozilla or
the way how we use you can do this in a civilized manor.
The problem is not Mozilla
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
On other platforms there is no global key store, that's the reason why
we have chosen to rely on a Mozilla profile.
what about GNOME keyring, Apple KeyChain, .. ?
I think this assumption is no longer valid.
- Oliver
-
Hi Rene,
> We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap (remember: we still are shipping
> a
> unmaintained, old, unsupported, security-buggy version), also for LDAP
> access, but
> that's an other story...
Glad to hear you volunteer to work on this, it is definitely most
welcome. For both the
You might be true about Apple (which is not in my personal focus - any
volunteers?), but some GNOME stuff doesn't help for people using KDE or
other things...
Malte.
Oliver Braun wrote, On 10/19/06 08:55:
> Hi Malte,
>
> Malte Timmermann wrote:
>> On other platforms there is no global key store,
The area of certificate verification is very complex. There are
different RFCs and other specifications, as well as different
requirements in separate countries (e.g. German Signature Law). I
haven't seen so far a statement that either Microsoft or Mozilla
guarantee 100 % compliance to a partic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap
>
> If you want to be taken serious you should stop to use offending words
> like the ones above. If you have some valid complaints about Mozilla or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
> > We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap (remember: we still are
> > shipping a
> > unmaintained, old, unsupported, security-buggy version), also for LDAP
> > access, but
> > that's an ot
The mozilla stuff doesn't help konqueror/kmail users as well. And we
already do a lot of other things differently in certain desktop
environments.
The best solution would be if OOo could access both kinds of key stores
either concurrently or by user's choice. We may even find volunteers to
im
Hi Malte,
On Thursday, 2006-10-19 09:53:52 +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote:
> You might be true about Apple (which is not in my personal focus - any
> volunteers?), but some GNOME stuff doesn't help for people using KDE or
> other things...
GnuPG, window manager independent, runs on quite a few pl
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>
>> > We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap
>>
>> If you want to be taken serious you should stop to use offending words
>> like the ones above. If you have
12 matches
Mail list logo
