Re: [dev] Re: can not

2008-12-16 Thread Marcin MiƂkowski
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak pisze: Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: On 12/12/2008 14:43, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: FYI, I see a lot of "can not" in the file connectivity/source/resource.po. As far as I can tell, it should be "cannot". hmm, in

Re: [dev] Re: can not

2008-12-14 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: On 12/12/2008 14:43, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: FYI, I see a lot of "can not" in the file connectivity/source/resource.po. As far as I can tell, it should be "cannot". hmm, interesting question :) It

Re: [dev] Re: can not

2008-12-12 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 12/12/2008 14:43, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: >> >> FYI, >> >> I see a lot of "can not" in the file connectivity/source/resource.po. >> As far as I can tell, it should be "cannot". > > hmm, interesting question :) It is not a question but a pro

[dev] Re: can not

2008-12-12 Thread Michael Stahl
On 12/12/2008 14:43, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: FYI, I see a lot of "can not" in the file connectivity/source/resource.po. As far as I can tell, it should be "cannot". hmm, interesting question :) actually istr both are valid... let's see... The negative of the auxiliary can, cannot occurs less