On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jon Burgess wrote:
> | This should avoid problems like the roundabout next to Heathrow T5[1]
> | which has both highway= and landuse= tags. Because of the landuse
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Jon Burgess wrote:
> | This should avoid problems like the roundabout next to Heathrow T5[1]
> | which has both highway= and landuse= tags. Because of the lan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Burgess wrote:
| This should avoid problems like the roundabout next to Heathrow T5[1]
| which has both highway= and landuse= tags. Because of the landuse tag
| this is currently only appearing in the polygon table but it really
| needs to appear i
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Marcus Wolschon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello Martijn.
>
> | highway=unclassified;cycleway
>
> This at least is not unreasonable.
> It is an unclassified road featuring a bicycle-lane.
No. Your example
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Martijn.
| highway=unclassified;cycleway
This at least is not unreasonable.
It is an unclassified road featuring a bicycle-lane.
| sport=baseball;basketball
For me this makes perfect sense.
I have seen my fair share of
sport-fields that are
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Lauri Hahne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But unfortunately there are cases when it's necessary to have multiple
> values. The most common of these is if two refs share a road. A road
> near me actually officially has two refs and two int_refs. Google
> renders
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Lauri Hahne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/04/2008, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're right, I was thinking too far ahead. I won't complain if they
> > enter "6;8" and they shouldn't complain when it's treated as if they
> > had
On 14/04/2008, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, I was thinking too far ahead. I won't complain if they
> enter "6;8" and they shouldn't complain when it's treated as if they
> had entered "6". I was thinking that we should point out that using
> semicolons is nic
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 3. "work with what we've got" and fix the data we get out of the
>>system to suit our needs.
>>
>> Dave's patch is in the s
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. "work with what we've got" and fix the data we get out of the
>system to suit our needs.
>
> Dave's patch is in the spirit of option 3, and frankly I think that
> way is the only acceptable way.
You're right, I
10 matches
Mail list logo
