Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
>> Is this an example of early node ID's being affected by someone
>> messing with
>> a JOSM upload file?
>
> I guess it is. I have stumbled upon this by accident; nodes 1-17 were
> uploaded as railway entrances in Praha on 04 A
Hi,
Matt Amos wrote:
> there is a small bug that means JOSM (from r1523) isn't able to upload
> to the 0.6 API.
Oh, that sounds like just a minor inconvenience, not a real bug ;-) I
mean who wants to upload stuff anyway?
I have committed your patch and rebuilt the josm-latest download. I was
p
Hi,
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> Is this an example of early node ID's being affected by someone messing with
> a JOSM upload file?
I guess it is. I have stumbled upon this by accident; nodes 1-17 were
uploaded as railway entrances in Praha on 04 April. The user in question
has no
there is a small bug that means JOSM (from r1523) isn't able to upload
to the 0.6 API. could someone with SVN please commit the following
patch?
cheers,
matt
Index: src/org/openstreetmap/josm/io/OsmApi.java
===
--- src/org/openstree
[This has already been announced on the talk-gb list, but obviously
there is likely to be interest here as well.]
I have written a routing algorithm that uses OSM format data as its
input and calculates either the shortest or quickest route between two
points.
You can select from any of the majo
Frederik,
I note that for node 9 you have left it as visible=true when the original
data was false?
http://openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/node/09/history
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
>On Behalf Of Stefan de Konink
Is this an example of early node ID's being affected by someone messing with
a JOSM upload file?
>-Original Message-
>From: dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
>On Behalf Of Stefan de Konink
>Sent: 16 April 2009 4:50 PM
>To: dev@openstreetmap.org
>Subject:
Please review the first nodes in the dataset. It seems user Woodpeck is
fixing them. I wonder what started it. Is there any discussion about it
going on?
http://openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/node/10/history
As example.
Stefan
___
dev mailing list
dev@op
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:32:22 +0200, Frederik Ramm
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> Does anyone have a valid, small .osc.gz -file in api 0.6 format
>> that I could use for testing?
>> I'd like to verify that my loading of changefiles works but
>> I can't get test-data in a
Hi,
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Does anyone have a valid, small .osc.gz -file in api 0.6 format
> that I could use for testing?
> I'd like to verify that my loading of changefiles works but
> I can't get test-data in api0.6 -format anywhere and can't find
> a migrate-task in Osmosis.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Karl Newman wrote:
> > I've been around OSM for a few years now and I was not aware
> > "private" GPS trackpoints were available for download.
>
> Firstly, the API does not talk of "private" GPS tracks. It only gives
> you a checkbox saying "public".
If you go to "My GPS
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> ...or use the ti...@home tile server which has no restricted usage policy.
Hehe, so far not.
However, I reserve the right to temporarily or permanently ban users
that I perceive as a threat to the stability of the system.
I don't care whether the tiles are used commercial
Hello.
Does anyone have a valid, small .osc.gz -file in api 0.6 format
that I could use for testing?
I'd like to verify that my loading of changefiles works but
I can't get test-data in api0.6 -format anywhere and can't find
a migrate-task in Osmosis.
Marcus
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
