That's super great! Excited to hear that.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Joe Richards wrote:
>
> I've been working on the LINZ data import, on attribution/legal as well
> as the actual import. The LINZ data I have is actually via the NZ
> Open GPS project and is in Polish Map (.mp) format, whic
Jeffrey Warren wrote:
> I'd like to, but how does the schema you want differ from the schemas
> Brett Henderson hosts?
>
> And along those lines, should we remove the foreign key constraints
> from the schema, Brett, if they're not necessary and they cause
> Osmosis imports to fail?
I don't min
Agreed, it's quite confusing. The page you reference seems hard to maintain
since it's basically an image. Perhaps a sub-page for each schema would be
nice? At least mentioning the simple-schema, the rails-port schema (the one
in the migrations) and the one brett hosts, those three would be quite n
SteveC schrieb:
> But then it becomes a question of 'what is authoritative' and we get
> arguments that the government calls this road a primary but we have it
> marked as secondary...
Well, this also raises the question: "Who is authoritative enough (for
us), to authorize that the authorativ
I don't think I want a different one, I was just struggling to understand
what the differences are between all these different databases that people
use so I can choose one, and thought it would be worth documenting it once I
had worked it out!
Graham
2009/6/30 Jeffrey Warren
> I'd like to, but
I'd like to, but how does the schema you want differ from the schemas Brett
Henderson hosts?
And along those lines, should we remove the foreign key constraints from the
schema, Brett, if they're not necessary and they cause Osmosis imports to
fail?
Jeff
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Graham Jo
I've been working on the LINZ data import, on attribution/legal as well
as the actual import. The LINZ data I have is actually via the NZ
Open GPS project and is in Polish Map (.mp) format, which seems
to use Garmin types for its features.
I've hacked around with a few other scripts and have cre
On 30 Jun 2009, at 10:56, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> SteveC wrote:
>> We could have an 'authoritative' layer. All authoritative data could
>> sit in planet-authoritative.osm - it can't be that big really on the
>> scale of things.
>
> Great tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC wrote:
> We could have an 'authoritative' layer. All authoritative data could
> sit in planet-authoritative.osm - it can't be that big really on the
> scale of things.
Great that you like the idea too. Could we maybe just start with some
We could have an 'authoritative' layer. All authoritative data could
sit in planet-authoritative.osm - it can't be that big really on the
scale of things.
Or we could lock a few things like wikipedia locks the Jesus and
Scientology pages and only certain people can edit them.
Are there any
10 matches
Mail list logo
