On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:29:29 +0100, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de
wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669$
should this be http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43826694
or http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669
or sth. else?
2009/11/18 marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:29:29 +0100, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de
wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669$
should this be http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43826694
or http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669
or
On 18 Nov 2009, at 07:17, marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
I just selected multiple ways of a long road in the
correct order in potlatch and
clicked to add them to a new relation.
For your information, Potlatch does not allow the selecting of multiple ways.
Shift clicking ways joins
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:05:02 -0800, Stellan Lagerstrom
lagerst...@blindsight.com wrote:
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
I just selected multiple ways of a long road in the
correct order in potlatch and
clicked to add them to a new relation.
As you may have discovered, that is not
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:38:04 +, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
2009/11/18 Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com:
2009/11/18 marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:29:29 +0100, Peter Körner
osm-li...@mazdermind.de
wrote:
Great - I was searching for something like this!
many thanks
Michael
On 17.11.2009, at 12:05, Patrick Petschge Kilian wrote:
Hi,
Is there an artificial reference .osm available, which shows different
rendering scenarios?
Especially for those building a rendering engine, it could be
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
I found that behavior not only
counter-intuitive but outright dangerous.
Visual feedback is exactly as one would expect,
nothing to point out that it has joined the ways,
no warning that the ways do not even have identical tags,...
The warning only
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Karl Guggisberg
karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch wrote:
Hi
A JOSM user reported a 401 status message after a PUT
/api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id,
see
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3887#comment:7
Why is it doing a PUT
I think it's this call, not the GET equivalent
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#Update:_PUT_.2Fapi.2F0.6.2F.5Bnode.7Cway.7Crelation.5D.2F.23id
Regards
Karl
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marcus Wolschon [mailto:marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18.
On 18/11/09 18:17, Karl Guggisberg wrote:
A JOSM user reported a 401 status message after a PUT
/api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id,
see
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3887#comment:7
(see his JOSM logs).
Under what conditions is the OSM server replying a 401 after an object
update?
Could devlopers make Mapink to render sea names, region names, county
rendering?
I see there are nodes with names, but AFAIK no noline renderer supports
them.
It would be good that it can render those name depending on size of area it
takes.
For example Pacific ocean (very large) ; Black Sea
On 19/11/09 00:00, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
The OSM wiki looks bad in recent webkit-based browsers due to an
outdated KHTML hack in MediaWiki, to fix it delete:
phase3/skins/monobook/KHTMLFixes.css
And apply this patch:
Marcus Wolschon wrote:
I found that behavior not only
counter-intuitive but outright dangerous.
Visual feedback is exactly as one would expect,
nothing to point out that it has joined the ways,
no warning that the ways do not even have identical tags,...
...no chance that users might
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Marcus Wolschon wrote:
...no chance that users might actually read some documentation? No, of
course not. Silly me.
We`ve all been spoiled by WindowsCo just expecting
ctrl+c to copy, enter to push a button that has
14 matches
Mail list logo
