Hallo,
I want to setup up an own OSM server as a mirror. Therefore I downloaded
the planet file (2009/12/02) and used osmosis for import with following
command line:
bzcat '/data/osm/all/20091202/planet-latest.osm.bz2' | osmosis
--read-xml-0.6 file='-' --log-progress --write-apidb host=
Hi,
Frank Bielig wrote:
> I want to setup up an own OSM server as a mirror. Therefore I downloaded
> the planet file (2009/12/02) and used osmosis for import with following
> command line:
The planet files do not have referential integrity. Because the ways are
dumped long after the nodes, if
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> The planet files do not have referential integrity. Because the ways are
> dumped long after the nodes, if someone creates a new way plus new nodes
> some time during the planet dump creation, the new way will be in the
> dump but the new nodes will not.
I thought that w
On 13 Dec 2009, at 10:47, Lennard wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> The planet files do not have referential integrity. Because the ways are
>> dumped long after the nodes, if someone creates a new way plus new nodes
>> some time during the planet dump creation, the new way will be in the
>>
Hi,
Lennard wrote:
> I thought that was fixed, and the dump now runs in a transaction?
No; many seem to think it is fixed but simple inspection of the current
planet file tells you that the highest node id therein is 583444559
(added 2009-12-09T01:19:27Z), whereas the highest *referenced* node
Many thanks for fast and valuable responses. One more open question I have.
Currently I need about four days for importing the whole planet file. Is
that a normal computing time? The bottleneck seems to be the database
(PostgreSQL). Are there any hints for the database configuration? For
conve
There are some additional hints on the following wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik#Loading_Data
I'm sure other people on the list will be able to add more than me on tuning
postgres. You should expect it to take a day or two to load if the disks are
slow. There are a few discu
> Currently I need about four days for importing the whole planet file. Is
> that a normal computing time? The bottleneck seems to be the database
> (PostgreSQL). Are there any hints for the database configuration? For
> conversion I use a quadcore machine with 8GB RAM. Data files are
> located on
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:41 +, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> There are some additional hints on the following wiki page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik#Loading_Data
>
> I'm sure other people on the list will be able to add more than me on tuning
> postgres. You should expect it to take
I wanted to submit a ticket to trac, but at submitting I received this error:
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/trac/web/main.py", line 406, in
dispatch_request
dispatcher.dispatch(req)
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/tr
On 13/12/09 15:47, Maarten Deen wrote:
> Any reason why the trac database is locked?
Yes, somebody else is accessing it. Try again and it will almost
certainly work.
We should be getting the wiki off that machine soon which should
eliminate these problems.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu
> We should be getting the wiki off that machine soon which should
> eliminate these problems.
Are you using sqlite or a postgres db? We switched to postgres to solve
exactly this issue.
Peter
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.
On 13/12/09 17:00, Peter Körner wrote:
>> We should be getting the wiki off that machine soon which should
>> eliminate these problems.
>
> Are you using sqlite or a postgres db? We switched to postgres to solve
> exactly this issue.
It's Berkeley DB I think, isn't it? I didn't install it, so I d
On 13/12/09 17:21, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 13/12/09 17:00, Peter Körner wrote:
>
>> Are you using sqlite or a postgres db? We switched to postgres to solve
>> exactly this issue.
>
> It's Berkeley DB I think, isn't it? I didn't install it, so I don't know
> for sure but it's likely to be whatever t
Hi,
I just noticed that if you open Potlatch and skip to another tab above
[view|edit|history|export]
a new changeset is opened each time - even if you have saved your editings.
Maybe it's not important (and I actually don't care) but people might
find it annoying to have lots of changesets still
the wiki says:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6
Delete: DELETE /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id
Expects a valid XML representation of the element to be deleted.
---
What exactly does the term 'valid XML representation of the element'
mean?
Is it the same what I would get when download
yes. I think, at least the node data like id and version.
mike
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM, hy-soft wrote:
> the wiki says:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6
>
> Delete: DELETE /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id
>
> Expects a valid XML representation of the element to be deleted.
>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 17:54, hy-soft wrote:
> the wiki says:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6
>
> Delete: DELETE /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id
>
> Expects a valid XML representation of the element to be deleted.
> ---
> What exactly does the term 'valid XML representation of the
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 17:54, hy-soft wrote:
> > the wiki says:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6
> >
> > Delete: DELETE /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id
> >
> > Expects a valid XML representation of the element to b
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 17:54, hy-soft wrote:
>> > the wiki says:
>> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6
>> >
>> > Delete: DELETE /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id
On 13 Dec 2009, at 19:29, Anthony wrote:
> ant to delete node id 54321 with tags foo=bar and bar=baz, then you send:
>
> DELETE /api/0.6/node/54321
>
> with content:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I thought you needed the version (and I forget if it's the new version or the
> old version). Wil
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 19:23, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 17:54, hy-soft wrote:
>> > the wiki says:
>> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6
>> >
>> > Delete: DELETE /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id
>>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
>
> Obviously they aren't hopeless in all cases, but I've frequently run
> into areas where it has been more useful to just read the source /
> network sniff than try to figure out what they're talking about.
>
Perhaps you (or others
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Shaun McDonald
wrote:
> It's the version of the item that you have downloaded. (i.e. the old
> version).
>
> Your welcome to add clarifications to the API docs to improve them for
> others.
>
Thanks for the invite. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the API
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 19:38, Ian Dees wrote:
> Perhaps you (or others) that spend the time to do the network sniffing could
> update the wiki API docs so that in the future these questions are answered
> without a trip to the mailing list?
I already know how it works so there's no personal gain
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 19:38, Ian Dees wrote:
> > Perhaps you (or others) that spend the time to do the network sniffing
> could
> > update the wiki API docs so that in the future these questions are
> answered
> > without a trip
hy-soft wrote:
> I just noticed that if you open Potlatch and skip to another tab above
> [view|edit|history|export]
> a new changeset is opened each time - even if you have saved your
> editings.
Um, are you sure?
Potlatch opens a changeset when you enter 'Edit live' mode, or when you save
you
It is not like people want to program an API most of the time.
they want to use a simple lib that wraps that api.
That is what we need, a libOSM that is up to date and usable in many languages.
mike
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> Is there personal gain for you in spending time on an Open Street Map? :-)
>
Of course there is.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> I thought you needed the version (and I forget if it's the new version
>> or the old version). Will it really work without the version?
No you really need the version and of course not the last changeset but
the changeset that represents your current processing(s).
> It'
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:14, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 19:38, Ian Dees wrote:
>> > Perhaps you (or others) that spend the time to do the network sniffing
>> > could
>> > update the wiki API docs so that in
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 17:52, hy-soft wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed that if you open Potlatch and skip to another tab above
> [view|edit|history|export]
> a new changeset is opened each time - even if you have saved your editings.
>
> Maybe it's not important (and I actually don't care) but peopl
On 13/12/09 20:26, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> hy-soft wrote:
>> I just noticed that if you open Potlatch and skip to another tab above
>> [view|edit|history|export]
>> a new changeset is opened each time - even if you have saved your
>> editings.
>
> Um, are you sure?
Yes, he is.
> Potlatch ope
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM, hy-soft wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed that if you open Potlatch and skip to another tab above
> [view|edit|history|export]
> a new changeset is opened each time - even if you have saved your editings.
>
> Maybe it's not important (and I actually don't care) but p
Tom Hughes wrote:
> Exactly, so if you switch away from Potlatch by clicking on a different
> tab and then switch back then the flash app will be restarted and will
> have to open a new changeset.
Sure, though I wouldn't say "a new changeset is opened each time". It's
not opened, you open it by c
35 matches
Mail list logo
