Fair point, but then I'm putting the C in RFC.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chris Browet wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:49, SteveC wrote:
> Seems like there are far more interesting things to do than that.
>
> Most probably, but the point is not prioritization
Bugs API built-in, front page clean up, splitting the db across multiple
machines, matts space station worldwide triangle system of infinity... (ask
matt)
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 12, 2010, at 1:53 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 13 October 2010 05:49, SteveC wrote:
>> Seems like there are fa
Isn't facebook becoming the biggest "legal" botnet ever created?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
+1
This is the point
Am 12.10.10 22:33, schrieb Alan Millar:
Frankly, one of the main problems with the classic GIS
"shapefile"-style data paradigm is that it does not give you good
topological connectivity information, and therefore is inadequate for
OSM's multi-use data model.
If you think to
Please don't make end users change too much on the next update!
I think the current data model is pretty OK, it is more a data data model than a sematical one. And
I think we should keep it like that ;)
Andi
Am 12.10.10 21:45, schrieb Chris Browet:
I am wondering (I wonder a lot lately ;-)) if
5 matches
Mail list logo