Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 27.11.2015 1:47, Dave F. napisał(a): However I still think there's something wrong with a system that takes years to render an almost universal accepted replacement tag for a deprecated one that was previously rendered. In my opinion there's hardly a "system" in OSM, because e

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Dave F.
Mateusz , Simon et al I admit I'm a bit of an outsider on this (I prefer going out, collecting data to upload) but I'm a bit surprised by these 'it's not possible really' comments. A few years ago it was announced that the carto schema (or whatever you want to call it) was to be 'overhauled

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Dave F.
Thanks to all for the information. It's becoming a bit clearer to me. However I still think there's something wrong with a system that takes years to render an almost universal accepted replacement tag for a deprecated one that was previously rendered. Am I right in thinking the style file ha

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread nebulon42
You should try to downsize the icon you referred to to 14x14px and see if it works for you. I have tried and it didn't, but otherwise the idea is quite good. As alternative that works on 14px I came up with the current icon and it was discussed at quite some length (55 comments). But the "measu

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Simon Poole
Dave Currently the rendering database is created with static rules that map OSM keys to columns, Mateusz has already pointed you to the config file for that, the likely solution for the issue is to re-import and besides the existing mapping method to import all tags (or at least nearly all) in to

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:58:50 + "Dave F." wrote: > Mateusz , Simon et al > > I admit I'm a bit of an outsider on this (I prefer going out, > collecting data to upload) but I'm a bit surprised by these 'it's not > possible really' comments. > > A few years ago it was announced that the carto

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:20:13 + "Dave F." wrote: > Hi > > @Holger: Could you explain why it's "technically not possible"? It > seems strange just this one node can't be rendered. Currently only tags listed at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/openstreetmap-carto

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:24:25 -0700 (MST) Gerd Petermann wrote: > OK, thanks for the quick feedback. The term "technically not possible" > seems to mean that I cannot help to fix it ? Anybody can help, but it requires some additional knowledge. For start "There's nothing published about moving a

Re: [osmosis-dev] Error: Could not find or load main class

2015-11-26 Thread Philipp Hukal
Hi Evgeniy, Thanks for your advice! I was, however, only semi-successful. Several re-installation and version changing attempts on Win8 were fruitless and now I', running Osmosis on Mac without problems... Took me literally 30 seconds to set up. I would be interested if others have solved it o

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Simon Poole
Am 26.11.2015 um 13:20 schrieb Dave F.: > Hi > > @Holger: Could you explain why it's "technically not possible"? It > seems strange just this one node can't be rendered. > > Because the rendering database doesn't contain the information and any strategy to fix it requires a reimport of the databa

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Dave F.
Hi @Holger: Could you explain why it's "technically not possible"? It seems strange just this one node can't be rendered. This icon was proposed & received general approval: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/118#issuecomment-67555409 I'm unsure why it's not gained

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Gerd Petermann
OK, thanks for the quick feedback. The term "technically not possible" seems to mean that I cannot help to fix it ? Gerd Holger Jeromin wrote > Gerd Petermann wrote on 26.11.2015 10:57: >> I know we should not map for the renderer, but why is >> the deprecated and rarely used highway=ford >> re

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Holger Jeromin
Gerd Petermann wrote on 26.11.2015 10:57: > I know we should not map for the renderer, but why is > the deprecated and rarely used highway=ford > rendered with a nice icon on https://www.openstreetmap.org > while the much more often and documented > ford=yes is not ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.or

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Thursday 26 November 2015, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > I know we should not map for the renderer, but why is > the deprecated and rarely used highway=ford > rendered with a nice icon on https://www.openstreetmap.org > while the much more often and documented > ford=yes is not ? Because the ford k

Re: [OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-11-26 10:57 GMT+01:00 Gerd Petermann : > I know we should not map for the renderer, but why is > the deprecated and rarely used highway=ford > rendered with a nice icon on https://www.openstreetmap.org > while the much more often and documented > ford=yes is not ? > because currently in the

[OSM-dev] Why is ford=yes not rendered in the default style?

2015-11-26 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all, I know we should not map for the renderer, but why is the deprecated and rarely used highway=ford rendered with a nice icon on https://www.openstreetmap.org while the much more often and documented ford=yes is not ? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.co