[josm-dev] Patch for Validator crossingways test - fixes excluded railways and duplicate ways

2008-06-08 Thread Roy Rankin
subways but will test other types of railways. The second issue was that ways were being listed twice. I have used the same method as was in my accepted patch for duplicate ways in the OverlappingWays test to address this issue. Regards, Roy Rankin

Re: [josm-dev] Validator patch for overlapping ways

2008-05-22 Thread Roy Rankin
in this patch) Regards, Roy Rankin On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:34 +1000, Roy Rankin wrote: I have submitted a patch to TRAC, ticket 774. The following is from the report: ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi

[josm-dev] Validator patch for overlapping ways

2008-05-21 Thread Roy Rankin
I have submitted a patch to TRAC, ticket 774. The following is from the report: regards, Roy Rankin This patch does two things. First, redundant overlapping ways are only reported once, and secondly, overlapping highways and railways are reported separately. The current overlapping way test

Re: [josm-dev] Validator patch for overlapping ways

2008-05-21 Thread Roy Rankin
in the validation layer. Regards, Roy Rankin Dave Hansen wrote: On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:34 +1000, Roy Rankin wrote: I have submitted a patch to TRAC, ticket 774. The following is from the report: Could you post here, too? I've been doing some hacking on it as well, to the same end. I also added

[josm-dev] Validator plugin WronglyOrderedWays false error

2008-05-11 Thread Roy Rankin
then before. I also noticed the validation error result labels were not correct and fixed this error. Attached are my changes. Regards, Roy Rankin * ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [josm-dev] Validator plugin WronglyOrderedWays false error

2008-05-11 Thread Roy Rankin
Thanks Martijn. I have convinced myself your tip is the correct approach (although your formula is slightly wrong as it gives twice the area) and I have replaced my changes with a new fix using this new approach in the 737 trac ticket. Regards, Roy Rankin Martijn van Oosterhout wrote