-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
> That's cool.
> There's no question we need better editors, and any improvements you
> can help with will really help.
> If you have any coding experience then check out the code in svn and
> see what you can do :-)
I'll try it the other w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> Yeah, there's no really good reason why you need to edit in that
> order, other than it's easier to program, and probably more how most
> people think.
No it's not.
> Our dynamic ontology, and largely tag ambivalent editors are w
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Fr, 4.07.2008, 12:39, schrieb Erik Johansson:
>> This has come up before, in different ways each time. I know started
>> thinking that any editor would first let you choose the type, and then
>> let you draw it, like in Google M
El Viernes, 4 de Julio de 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) escribió:
> m*sh wrote:
> >Why should there be any order at all? [...]
>
> If its not ordered logically, how would you route over it?
Easy:
http://xkcd.com/407/
Cheers,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega <
m*sh wrote:
>Sent: 04 July 2008 3:05 PM
>To: dev@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] When mental models go wrong:
>OpenStreetMap
>
>
>Am Fr, 4.07.2008, 12:39, schrieb Erik Johansson:
>> This has come up before, in different ways each time. I know s
Am Fr, 4.07.2008, 12:39, schrieb Erik Johansson:
> This has come up before, in different ways each time. I know started
> thinking that any editor would first let you choose the type, and then
> let you draw it, like in Google Map Maker. But since we had the
> segments untagged in the beginning I
> But kudos to you, most people try to normalise the data model onto
> relations, but normalising to nodes is thinking outside the box.
I didn't say that we do not need relations.
> Of
> course it's basically a tag version of segments which were ditched due
> to the extra processing requirements
Dave Stubbs wrote:
>Sent: 04 July 2008 9:14 AM
>To: m*sh
>Cc: dev@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] When mental models go wrong:
>OpenStreetMap
>
>On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:20 AM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSA
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:20 AM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lauri Hahne wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> 1. Ways
>>
>> - There are one kind of ways in the database. Ways can have attributes
>> (tags) but aren't required.
>> - The tagging scheme suggest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lauri Hahne wrote:
> [...]
>
> 1. Ways
>
> - There are one kind of ways in the database. Ways can have attributes
> (tags) but aren't required.
> - The tagging scheme suggest there are many kinds of ways (highway,
> cycleway, aeroway...)
> - Potlatch
10 matches
Mail list logo
