Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: [Geowanking] [Fwd: [Ann] LinkedGeoData.org]

2009-07-18 Thread Tels
On Friday 17 July 2009 02:26:11 andrzej zaborowski wrote: > 2009/7/15 Mikel Maron : > > From discussion about linkedgeodata.org/ on geowanking... > > > > From: Sean Gillies > > To: geowank...@geowanking.org > > > >> I'm skeptical about RDF too, but the linked geodata folks are > >> adding some ext

Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: [Geowanking] [Fwd: [Ann] LinkedGeoData.org]

2009-07-16 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/7/15 Mikel Maron : > From discussion about linkedgeodata.org/ on geowanking... > > From: Sean Gillies > To: geowank...@geowanking.org >> >> I'm skeptical about RDF too, but the linked geodata folks are adding some >> extra value (at least for a particular group of users): hypertext, so that >

Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: [Geowanking] [Fwd: [Ann] LinkedGeoData.org]

2009-07-15 Thread OJ W
like the WOEID system that Yahoo! were pushing for us to use? ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: [Geowanking] [Fwd: [Ann] LinkedGeoData.org]

2009-07-15 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Mikel Maron wrote: > At the moment, we don't have permalinks, because the API > version is included in the URL. Perhaps the API could also > support read-only, permalinks for objects, like > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/node/264695865 Absolutely. The problem with doing it that way is that

[OSM-dev] Fw: [Geowanking] [Fwd: [Ann] LinkedGeoData.org]

2009-07-15 Thread Mikel Maron
>From discussion about linkedgeodata.org/ on geowanking... From: Sean Gillies To: geowank...@geowanking.org > > I'm skeptical about RDF too, but the linked geodata folks are adding some > extra value (at least for a particular group of users): hypertext, so that > you or your software can fo