Eddy Petrișor writes:
> So, AIUI, even JOSM or any other sw that works with relatively high
> loads of data at a time could bring up the same behaviour?
The standard API does not allow you to delete a node that is still
referenced by a way. Therefore, this type of problem should not be
possible
2009/1/13 "Marc Schütz" :
>> Diff uploads will not help online editor such as Potlatch. The
>> addition of transactions and exposure of the version numbers will help
>> more.
>
> Why not? It may well utilize it for changes to multiple objects that should
> be atomic, e.g. the example mentioned her
> Diff uploads will not help online editor such as Potlatch. The
> addition of transactions and exposure of the version numbers will help
> more.
Why not? It may well utilize it for changes to multiple objects that should be
atomic, e.g. the example mentioned here.
Regards, Marc
--
Pt!
On 13 Jan 2009, at 12:14, Marc Schütz wrote:
>>> It has been explained many times in the
>>> past, not just
>>> by me, that database freakiness _will_ happen because we don't
>>> have
>>> transactions, our server is often under high load, and there
>>> may be memory
>>> leaks or blocking processe
On 13 Jan 2009, at 09:22, Ed Loach wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>
>> It has been explained many times in the
>> past, not just
>> by me, that database freakiness _will_ happen because we don't
>> have
>> transactions, our server is often under high load, and there
>> may be memory
>> leaks or blocking
> > It has been explained many times in the
> > past, not just
> > by me, that database freakiness _will_ happen because we don't
> > have
> > transactions, our server is often under high load, and there
> > may be memory
> > leaks or blocking processes in some of the software we use.
>
> Do I un
Richard Fairhurst a scris:
> D Tucny wrote:
>> Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>> What's even more weirder is the fact that if I try to edit with
>>> Potlatch, the way is displayed correctly, as if stale data was read of
>>> as if Mapnik's data was read.
>>> [...]
>> There was a post 12 hours ago to the tal
Richard wrote:
> It has been explained many times in the
> past, not just
> by me, that database freakiness _will_ happen because we don't
> have
> transactions, our server is often under high load, and there
> may be memory
> leaks or blocking processes in some of the software we use.
Do I unde
D Tucny wrote:
>Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> What's even more weirder is the fact that if I try to edit with
>> Potlatch, the way is displayed correctly, as if stale data was read of
>> as if Mapnik's data was read.
>> [...]
>
> There was a post 12 hours ago to the talk list about the exact same
> th
2009/1/13 Eddy Petrișor
> Hello,
>
> We have just seen that a portion of the map I edited yesterday with
> Potlatch is now really broken, is missing lots of points and has its
> history broken.
>
>
> http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.86196&lon=24.89171&zoom=16&layers=B000FTTT
>
> This is easily vi
Hello,
We have just seen that a portion of the map I edited yesterday with
Potlatch is now really broken, is missing lots of points and has its
history broken.
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.86196&lon=24.89171&zoom=16&layers=B000FTTT
This is easily visible when comparing mapnik and osmarender
11 matches
Mail list logo
